Quality and flexibility performance trade-offs between lean and agile manufacturing firms in the automotive industry

Abstract

Firms operating in the automotive industry have traditionally been ascribed with efficiency and high levels of quality, as lean production has been extensively applied within this context, but given the recent dynamics in the automotive sector, there is also a need for high levels of flexibility, widening our attention to agile production. However, when lean and agile production have been explored simultaneously, the quality and flexibility trade-offs have been mixed and unclear. In order to dispel the lean-agile ambiguity, and given that both high levels of flexibility and quality are required within the automotive industry, the purpose of this study was to: a) Identify the relationship between flexibility and quality; and b) Explore the quality and flexibility differences between lean and agile production. Primary quantitative data was obtained via a survey and a total of 140 automotive manufacturing firms within the UK returned the survey. Logistic regressions were utilised as the main mode of analysis. Not only was an inverse relationship found between quality and flexibility, but our findings depict two distinctive Business Models (BMs) existing in the automotive industry, one lean and one agile. We advance the lean-agile debate by asserting that lean and agile firms acquire quality (efficiency) and flexibility strengths respectively, and not vice-versa. Given this, we theoretically side with the notion of performance 'trade-offs' and contend the idea that capabilities are cumulatively gained. By incorporating an argument built on the strategy literature on BMs and Dynamic Capabilities, we assert that lean and agile firms have evolved to underpin different kinds of competitive advantage within the same industry, but these advantages are placed at different tiers in the automotive supply chain.

Strategies for Managing the Impacts of Disruptions During COVID-19: an Example of Toilet Paper

“…During an extraordinary crisis, like COVID-19, strategies under flexible manufacturing and supply chains play a significant role in recovering the impact (Altay et al 2018 ; Hosseini et al 2019 ; Qamar et al 2019 ). For example, a positive and flexible mindset is vital for implementing the ‘ resource sharing among all manufacturers’ and ‘use of collective emergency sourcing’ strategies.…”

A Analysis of Factors Affecting Waste Using Value Stream Mapping (VSM) On Kaosbekas.Id

“…By having an efficiency, the company can also get its competitiveness (Ding et al, 2021). Like Ding et al (2021) and Qamar et al (2020) also found in their study that lean manufacturing can lead to efficiency. It can also be referred the previous study by Zaheer et al, (2020) and Endang & Novita (2022) in which they argued as based on their findings, that in lean environment, the company has a focus on eliminating waste so that the company is more efficient in production process.…”

A hybrid multi-criteria decision-making approach to assess the enablers of manufacturing flexibility under fuzzy environment

“…Further, it has been confirmed that firms do not follow ambidextrous approach. Thus, firms either possess a high level of flexibility or maintain a high level of quality (Qamar et al , 2019).…”