2017
DOI: 10.3310/hsdr05280
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality and reporting standards, resources, training materials and information for realist evaluation: the RAMESES II project

Abstract: Background Many of the problems confronting policy- and decision-makers, evaluators and researchers today are complex, as are the interventions designed to tackle them. Their success depends both on individuals’ responses and on the wider context of people’s lives. Realist evaluation tries to make sense of these complex interventions. It is a form of theory-driven evaluation, based on realist philosophy, that aims to understand why these complex interventions work, how, for whom, in what cont… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
163
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(165 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
163
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Francesca Caló https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4755-3959 E N D N OTE S 1 RAMESES II provides guidance on quality assurance and uniform reporting for improving quality and consistency of realist evaluation studies (Wong et al, 2017).…”
Section: O Rci Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Francesca Caló https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4755-3959 E N D N OTE S 1 RAMESES II provides guidance on quality assurance and uniform reporting for improving quality and consistency of realist evaluation studies (Wong et al, 2017).…”
Section: O Rci Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A realist perspective of the human environment exposes the biopsychosocial context within which health care should be interpreted . Consequently, the realist review seeks, interprets and appraises the vast social and personal environments in which disease and therapeutic interventions occur . Mixed methods research, as an example, generates ideas and tests hypotheses or propositions with the strength of both qualitative and quantitative methods, and has been used to translate knowledge from clinical trials to other environmental contexts …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A team of three evaluators coded data for the sites individually in a nonblinded fashion consistent with realist evaluation quality and reporting standards (Wong et al, ). Consensus agreement validated individual site coding.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%