2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2018.07.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality control in dual head gamma-cameras: Comparison between methods and software used for image analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Point source images were reconstructed using Tera-Tomo™ 3D SPECT-Q with the settings and post filters described above, except for using 1.8 mm voxel size. ImageJ NMQC plugin [ 47 ] was used to calculate FWHM and FWTM on each reconstructed image set. Mean and Standard Deviation (St.Dev.)…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Point source images were reconstructed using Tera-Tomo™ 3D SPECT-Q with the settings and post filters described above, except for using 1.8 mm voxel size. ImageJ NMQC plugin [ 47 ] was used to calculate FWHM and FWTM on each reconstructed image set. Mean and Standard Deviation (St.Dev.)…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Point source images were reconstructed using Tera-Tomo™ 3D SPECT-Q with the settings and post lters described above, except for using 1.8 mm voxel size. ImageJ NMQC plugin (39) was used to calculate FWHM and FWTM on each reconstructed image set. Mean and Standard Deviation (St.Dev.)…”
Section: Spatial Resolution Spatial Resolution Was Determined In Term...mentioning
confidence: 99%