Quality Initiatives: Planning, Setting Up, and Carrying Out Radiology Process Improvement Projects

Abstract

In the coming decades, those who provide radiologic imaging services will be increasingly challenged by the economic, demographic, and political forces affecting healthcare to improve their efficiency, enhance the value of their services, and achieve greater customer satisfaction. It is essential that radiologists master and consistently apply basic process improvement skills that have allowed professionals in many other fields to thrive in a competitive environment. The authors provide a step-by-step overview of process improvement from the perspective of a radiologic imaging practice by describing their experience in conducting a process improvement project: to increase the daily volume of body magnetic resonance imaging examinations performed at their institution. The first step in any process improvement project is to identify and prioritize opportunities for improvement in the work process. Next, an effective project team must be formed that includes representatives of all participants in the process. An achievable aim must be formulated, appropriate measures selected, and baseline data collected to determine the effects of subsequent efforts to achieve the aim. Each aspect of the process in question is then analyzed by using appropriate tools (eg, flowcharts, fishbone diagrams, Pareto diagrams) to identify opportunities for beneficial change. Plans for change are then established and implemented with regular measurements and review followed by necessary adjustments in course. These so-called PDSA (planning, doing, studying, and acting) cycles are repeated until the aim is achieved or modified and the project closed.

Improving Inferior Vena Cava Filter Retrieval Rates with the Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control Methodology

“…First, a Plan is made and implemented on a small scale in the Do phase. The results of the trial are evaluated in the Study phase and are adopted, adapted, or abandoned in the Act phase (19). The iterative nature of the improvement cycle with small changes often takes several iterations to arrive at a manageable process.…”

Time Requirement and Feasibility of a Systematic Quality Peer Review of Reporting in Radiology

“…Ultimately, in addition to calculating the additional costs and effort, as carried out in our study, the potential benefit of a double reading has to be weighed against its potential benefits for patients. RADPEER was first introduced to identify patterns in frequently observed errors and to learn from past mistakes to prevent these in the future [9,10]. What is important for radiologists is to be aware that, while reporting errors can occur, there are efforts to minimize them [17].…”

How to perform low-dose computed tomography for renal colic in clinical practice

“…Currently all manufacturers systematically provide this display. Awareness is also raised by the software's dose-recording system that allows radiologists to monitor the doses absorbed by the patients and to detect cumulated doses, sometimes substantial [38,39]. More generally, national and international dose registers are available.…”