2020
DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(20)30081-4
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality of life in patients with cervical cancer after open versus minimally invasive radical hysterectomy (LACC): a secondary outcome of a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3, non-inferiority trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
56
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
56
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…1 In a landmark clinical trial of cervical cancer, the compliance rate of at least one QoL survey was 79%, showing the difficulty on this issue. 5 Notably, even during the pandemic, we found a potentially better patients' compliance with telemedicine compared to our previous experience.…”
Section: Telemedicine and Cancer Research During The Covid-19 Pandemicmentioning
confidence: 43%
“…1 In a landmark clinical trial of cervical cancer, the compliance rate of at least one QoL survey was 79%, showing the difficulty on this issue. 5 Notably, even during the pandemic, we found a potentially better patients' compliance with telemedicine compared to our previous experience.…”
Section: Telemedicine and Cancer Research During The Covid-19 Pandemicmentioning
confidence: 43%
“…The authors concluded that open radical hysterectomy should be recommended for patients with early-stage cervical cancer. [ 38 ]…”
Section: T He P Ost L Aparoscopic a Pproach To C Ermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A battery of analyses of the LACC trial has now added additional information that minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early cervical cancer is not associated with improved quality of life after surgery compared with open radical hysterectomy. [1][2][3] Taken together with the prior principal findings of the LACC trial including (1) increased risk of disease recurrence/death and (2) similar peri-operative morbidity in minimally invasive versus open radical hysterectomy, 2 3 the study team recommended that gynecologic oncologists perform open radical hysterectomy for women with early cervical cancer. 1 Because comparable survival, reduced surgical adverse events, and improved quality of life were the expected premise for performance of minimally invasive over open surgery, failure to demonstrate these three outcome measures argues against the utilization of a minimally invasive approach for cervical cancer treatment.…”
Section: Gynecological Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%