2024
DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.12.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality of Surveillance Impacts the Colitis-Associated Advanced Neoplasia Risk: A Multicenter Case-Control Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, large numbers of both CD-CRC and sporadic CRC cases were included, representing multiple institutions and, thus, Japanese clinical practice over the past 4 decades. Previous reports have shown that diagnosis in a later period is associated with better survival outcomes (25,35,36). In our study, diagnosis during 2009–2020 was significantly associated with better survival of RC, but not CC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, large numbers of both CD-CRC and sporadic CRC cases were included, representing multiple institutions and, thus, Japanese clinical practice over the past 4 decades. Previous reports have shown that diagnosis in a later period is associated with better survival outcomes (25,35,36). In our study, diagnosis during 2009–2020 was significantly associated with better survival of RC, but not CC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the geographical differences, it is necessary to establish tailor-made diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. In Western countries, regular colonoscopy is recommended for CD-CRC surveillance because of increasing detection of CRC, reducing the risk of advanced cancer(25,(35)(36)(37), but is often difficult because of anorectal stenosis or anal fistulas. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging are useful for determining the extent of lesions but not necessarily for early detection.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another limitation is that this study did not evaluate the quality parameters of endoscopy or the type of surveillance practice. Several variables including cecal intubation rates, bowel preparation, and withdrawal time are known to affect neoplasia detection and post-colonoscopy CRC [47,48]. In addition, the use of random biopsies and dye-spray or digital chromoendoscopy, especially in high-risk patients, could improve diagnostic yield.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The outcome of IBD surveillance colonoscopy is affected by the quality of the examination (45). In a Dutch case-control study, delayed surveillance intervals and active inflammation were associated with advanced neoplasia, whereas colonoscopies compliant with quality indicators such as cecal intubation and adequate bowel preparation were associated with reduced risk (45).…”
Section: Surveillance Guidelinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The outcome of IBD surveillance colonoscopy is affected by the quality of the examination (45). In a Dutch case-control study, delayed surveillance intervals and active inflammation were associated with advanced neoplasia, whereas colonoscopies compliant with quality indicators such as cecal intubation and adequate bowel preparation were associated with reduced risk (45). Factors that have been proposed as markers of high-quality IBD surveillance colonoscopy include bowel preparation, mucosal disease activity, endoscopist's experience, type of endoscope, and whether or not enhanced imaging was used (46).…”
Section: Surveillance Guidelinesmentioning
confidence: 99%