Quantification and homogenization of image noise between two CT scanner models

Abstract

Feedback from radiologists indicated that differences in image appearance and noise impeded reading of post-contrast computed tomography (CT) scans from an updated CT scanner that was recently added to a fleet of existing scanners from the same vendor, despite using identically named reconstruction algorithms. The goals of this work were to quantify and possibly standardize image quality on the new and an existing scanner using phantom images. Three months of daily quality control images were analyzed to determine the mean CT number and noise magnitude in a water phantom. Next, subtraction images from the uniformity section of an American College of Radiology CT phantom were used to generate noise power spectra for both scanners. Then, a semi-anthropomorphic liver phantom was imaged with both scanners in triplicate using identical body protocols to quantify differences CT number and noise magnitude. Finally, the scanner dependence of CT number and noise magnitude on material attenuation was quantified using a multi-energy CT phantom with 15 material inserts. Significant differences between scanners were determined using a paired or Welch's t test as appropriate. In daily quality control images, the new scanner exhibited slightly higher CT number (0.697 vs. 0.412, P < 0.001, n = 85) and slightly lower noise magnitude (4.85 vs. 4.94, P < 0.001, n = 85). Measured NPS was not significantly different between the existing and new scanners. Interestingly, it was observed that the noise magnitude from the new scanner increased with increasing material attenuation in both the liver (P = 0.008) and multi-energy (P < 0.001) phantoms. Using an alternate reconstruction algorithm with the new scanner eliminated this deviation at high material attenuations. While standard noise evaluation in a water phantom was unable to discern differences between the scanners, more comprehensive testing with higher attenuation materials allowed for the characterization and homogenization of image quality. K E Y W O R D S computed tomography, image noise, image quality, noise power spectrum ---

Impact of Noise Level on the Accuracy of Automated Measurement of CT Number Linearity on ACR CT and Computational Phantoms

“…Noise is an essential parameter in the CT image quality [ 12 , 27 ], and its suppression in QCT is used to enhance the accuracy of diagnosis [ 33 - 35 ]. Cruz-Bastida et al [ 36 ] reported that noise reduction in two phantoms (head and Catphan phantoms) significantly declines CT number bias, resulting in improving CT number accuracy.…”

Radiomics and Artificial Intelligence for Outcome Prediction in Multiple Myeloma Patients Undergoing Autologous Transplantation: A Feasibility Study with CT Data

“…Recent studies [35] have shown that the characteristics of the extracted features may depend on non-tumor related factors like the signal-to-noise ratio of the experimental data. Therefore, in the case of studies that utilize data from more than one scanner, data homogenization should be implemented prior to the data extraction process [36].…”

An evaluation of automated measurement of slice sensitivity profile of computed tomography image: field of view variations

“…Therefore, it is necessary to carry out further studies on this issue. The development of automatic measurements on AAPM CT performance phantom for all measurement parameters other than SSP (such as noise [25], low-contrast detectability [21], mechanical alignment, beam hardening, spatial resolution [26], HU linearity [27], and so on) may give great benefit to medical physicists in implementing quality control programs. Nevertheless, it still poses a challenge for future studies.…”