2014
DOI: 10.4209/aaqr2013.10.0304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification of Low Pressure Impactor Wall Deposits during Zinc Nanoparticle Sampling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of the studies, however, used monodisperse aerosols to calibrate and test impactors and found relatively little amount of wall deposits, which therefore are generally considered negligible. There were very few authors who applied polydisperse aerosols (Vaughan, 1989;Durand et al, 2014) for their investigations and they found higher relative wall losses (up to 50%) than the authors testing the devices with monodisperse aerosols. Still, all these studies were performed in laboratory conditions.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Most of the studies, however, used monodisperse aerosols to calibrate and test impactors and found relatively little amount of wall deposits, which therefore are generally considered negligible. There were very few authors who applied polydisperse aerosols (Vaughan, 1989;Durand et al, 2014) for their investigations and they found higher relative wall losses (up to 50%) than the authors testing the devices with monodisperse aerosols. Still, all these studies were performed in laboratory conditions.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 98%