2006
DOI: 10.1075/cilt.279.05sur
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying the functional load of phonemic oppositions, distinctive features, and suprasegmentals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
63
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our proposal shares with entropic accounts (Hockett, 1967;Surendran and Niyogi, 2003;Surendran and Niyogi, 2006) that it incorporates the probability of recognizing words (via contextual predictability). However, the present proposal also incorporates perceptual confusability.…”
Section: Theoretical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our proposal shares with entropic accounts (Hockett, 1967;Surendran and Niyogi, 2003;Surendran and Niyogi, 2006) that it incorporates the probability of recognizing words (via contextual predictability). However, the present proposal also incorporates perceptual confusability.…”
Section: Theoretical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional functional load-including recent extensions (Surendran and Niyogi, 2006;Wedel et al, 2013)-fail to capture the fact that real-world spoken word recognition is influenced by wordto-word confusability beyond the confusability of minimal pairs. For example, the perceptual confusability of pairs like /gAt/ and /cOt/ will never be taken into account, yet these two words are likely to be relatively confusable, even in American dialects that preserve the /A/-/O/ distinction.…”
Section: Contrast Loss Affects More Than Just Minimal Pairsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of functional load can be extended to include a broader sense, that of the informational relevance of linguistic features or classes of such features (see Surendran & Niyogi, 2006). From the viewpoint of functionalist approaches to language (e.g.…”
Section: Lingua Franca Approaches To Teaching and Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main argument I make is that it may be profitable to view the findings through the lens of functional load. This is something of a problematic concept (see Surendran & Niyogi, 2006), and in this chapter I make a distinction between narrow and broad senses of the term in order to clarify and elaborate its meaning.…”
Section: Lingua Franca Approaches To Teaching and Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation