2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2019.106606
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative approaches for optimization of user experience based on network resilience for wireless service provider networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…𝑇𝑇 � for different δ and Nsim. δ 2 11 2 13 2 15 2 17 2 19 avg 0 0.002833 0.011600 0.063967 0.254467 1.015033 0.269580 1 0.002667 0.010400 0.044767 0.181633 0.693600 0.186613 3 0.002733 0.010467 0.037900 0.151933 0.605367 0.161680 5 0.002300 0.008533 0.034133 0.133967 0.535000 0.142787 7 0.002000 0.007733 0.030933 0.122467 0.486300 0.129887 9 0.006667 0.011500 0.027167 0.105967 0.421967 0.114653 11 0.002500 0.006867 0.029933 0.098467 0.369567 0.101467 13 0.012233 0.016467 0.032533 0.092667 0.327867 0.096353 15 0.047200 0.050167 0.068433 0.121233 0.318800 0.121167 17 0.212833 0.214800 0.223800 0.271433 0.431600 0.270893 19 0.792700 0.794067 0.863100 0.886267 1.010367 0.869300 avg 0.098788 0.103873 0.132424 0.220045 0.565042…”
Section: Average Run Time 𝑇𝑇 �unclassified
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…𝑇𝑇 � for different δ and Nsim. δ 2 11 2 13 2 15 2 17 2 19 avg 0 0.002833 0.011600 0.063967 0.254467 1.015033 0.269580 1 0.002667 0.010400 0.044767 0.181633 0.693600 0.186613 3 0.002733 0.010467 0.037900 0.151933 0.605367 0.161680 5 0.002300 0.008533 0.034133 0.133967 0.535000 0.142787 7 0.002000 0.007733 0.030933 0.122467 0.486300 0.129887 9 0.006667 0.011500 0.027167 0.105967 0.421967 0.114653 11 0.002500 0.006867 0.029933 0.098467 0.369567 0.101467 13 0.012233 0.016467 0.032533 0.092667 0.327867 0.096353 15 0.047200 0.050167 0.068433 0.121233 0.318800 0.121167 17 0.212833 0.214800 0.223800 0.271433 0.431600 0.270893 19 0.792700 0.794067 0.863100 0.886267 1.010367 0.869300 avg 0.098788 0.103873 0.132424 0.220045 0.565042…”
Section: Average Run Time 𝑇𝑇 �unclassified
“…Standard deviations for different δ and Nsim. δ 2 11 2 13 2 15 2 17 2 19 avg 0 0.023924 0.013523 0.006838 0.003665 0.001624 0.009915 1 0.028306 0.012346 0.006542 0.003244 0.001613 0.010410 3 0.019739 0.011419 0.005203 0.002863 0.001412 0.008127 5 0.020445 0.011356 0.005272 0.002925 0.001478 0.008295 7 0.021986 0.010834 0.005591 0.002498 0.001401 0.008462 9 0.020792 0.009916 0.005446 0.002470 0.001342 0.007993 11 0.019218 0.009958 0.005171 0.002681 0.001325 0.007671 13 0.006552 0.009215 0.005373 0.002681 0.001421 0.005049 15 0.003724 0.004374 0.004180 0.002607 0.001475 0.003272 17 0.001410 0.002153 0.001750 0.002556 0.001272 0.001828 19 0.000693 0.001143 0.001165 0.000835 0.001089 0.000985 avg 0.015163 0.008749 0.004776 0.002639 0.001405…”
Section: Simulation Numbermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations