Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control 2011
DOI: 10.1145/1967701.1967715
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative automata model checking of autonomous stochastic hybrid systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
55
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using LTL and automata theory for finite statespace cdt-MP has a long history, part of which can be consulted in [BK08, Section 10.8]. However, extensions to the general state-space case have only appeared recently: [AKM11] has provided an extension to the uncontrolled case (where trivially 10 Note that in cdt-MP the choice of the distribution of the successor state is "labelled" by actions, whereas in gambling models such choice is unlabelled. One may think of this being similar to internal and external non-determinism in probabilistic automata [SL95], however there is no semantic difference between cdt-MP and gambling models, and in both cases non-determinism can be considered both as an internal one or as an external one.…”
Section: Theorem 1 the Following Equalities Hold Truementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using LTL and automata theory for finite statespace cdt-MP has a long history, part of which can be consulted in [BK08, Section 10.8]. However, extensions to the general state-space case have only appeared recently: [AKM11] has provided an extension to the uncontrolled case (where trivially 10 Note that in cdt-MP the choice of the distribution of the successor state is "labelled" by actions, whereas in gambling models such choice is unlabelled. One may think of this being similar to internal and external non-determinism in probabilistic automata [SL95], however there is no semantic difference between cdt-MP and gambling models, and in both cases non-determinism can be considered both as an internal one or as an external one.…”
Section: Theorem 1 the Following Equalities Hold Truementioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 Thermostat value X C where C CW is the thermal capacity of the water circuit and Q cool is the thermal energy removed by chillers. 2 The chilled water temperature controller keeps the chilled water temperature at the set point value T CWSP (another control parameter). The energy requirement is controlled by a feedback loop and hence designed as a PI control scheme:…”
Section: Modelling the Microgrid Configurationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerical methods to solve model-checking problems of stochastic hybrid systems against some temporal formulas (even reachability) are algorithmically involved and suffer from the curse of dimensionality [1,2,21]. Statistical model checking avoids these problems by resorting to discrete-event simulation (using Monte Carlo techniques).…”
Section: Model Checking the Microgridmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [7]- [10], the work of [6] was extended to quantify reachability properties in the probabilistic setting. In particular, it was shown that the dynamic programming solutions of [7], [8] constitute the main ingredient needed to verify logical specifications (in probabilistic computational tree logic (PCTL) [10] and linear temporal logic (LTL) [11]) in probability for DTSHS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%