2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchar.2016.10.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative characterization of material surface — Application to Ni + Mo electrolytic composite coatings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was assumed that the Δ W interval was small enough, and the ρ( z i ) was approximated by a continuous function ρ( z ), for which a Gaussian form was assumed. The Gaussian function described by the equation below was used for approximation of each histogram [ 70 , 71 ]: where A represents a constant of 1, σ is the standard deviation, denotes the average value of the Gaussian distribution expectation, i.e., a location of the FW peak value, and σ 2 is the Gaussian distribution variance, i.e., a measure of the distribution width WF . The Gaussian distribution curves of the WF for the sandblasted Ti G4 before and after autoclaving are shown in Figure 12 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was assumed that the Δ W interval was small enough, and the ρ( z i ) was approximated by a continuous function ρ( z ), for which a Gaussian form was assumed. The Gaussian function described by the equation below was used for approximation of each histogram [ 70 , 71 ]: where A represents a constant of 1, σ is the standard deviation, denotes the average value of the Gaussian distribution expectation, i.e., a location of the FW peak value, and σ 2 is the Gaussian distribution variance, i.e., a measure of the distribution width WF . The Gaussian distribution curves of the WF for the sandblasted Ti G4 before and after autoclaving are shown in Figure 12 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Statistical analysis of the obtained maps allows determining parameters describing quantitatively the surface properties i.e. average (CPD av ) and root mean square (CPD q ) of contact potential difference [46][47][48]. It was stated that the C125/1173 coating (Figure 6a, Table 4) is characterized by the highest value of CPD av which equals c.a.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parameters that describe quantitatively the material surface topography, i.e., the arithmetic mean deviation ( S a ), maximum peak height ( S p ), maximum valley depth ( S v ), skewness ( S sk ), and excess kurtosis ( S ku ) were determined. The detailed description of the parameters can be found elsewhere [ 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%