Proceedings of 3DBODY.TECH 2020 - 11th International Conference and Exhibition on 3D Body Scanning and Processing Technologies, 2020
DOI: 10.15221/20.35
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative Comparison of Manual vs. 3D Scanner Human Body Measurements

Abstract: Human body measurements are actively used in the clothing industry for production or finding the best possible garment fit. For the last few years digital methods based on 3D scans are replacing the traditional manual measurement techniques. In this paper we determine the quality of measurements obtained with a 3D scanner in terms of reliability and validity. Tape measurements from two expert measurers were used as a reference. Reliability comparison was evaluated in terms of Standard Error of Measurement and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this does not indicate that the assessment methods are insufficient for real-world applications [28]. Additionally, there are commercially available 3D scanners with 3D anthropometry software [86] that claim to obtain results lower than the AE and can hence be used in applications that require greater accuracies, such as medical and surveying applications.…”
Section: B Methodology Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this does not indicate that the assessment methods are insufficient for real-world applications [28]. Additionally, there are commercially available 3D scanners with 3D anthropometry software [86] that claim to obtain results lower than the AE and can hence be used in applications that require greater accuracies, such as medical and surveying applications.…”
Section: B Methodology Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [33], a comparison of the accuracy of body parameter measurement with the use of scanning systems and manual methods was made. It shows that, using the correct approach, one can achieve greater measurement accuracy using the analyzed automated systems.…”
Section: State Of the Art Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important question of a practical nature is, how accurate are the measurements with scanning systems compared to manual measurements? As indicated in the paper [ 20 ], when using automated measurement based on 3D scanners, the measurement uncertainty is usually superior than in the manual method compliant with ISO 20685. In the case of some of the dimensions of the figure discussed in this publication, the measurement uncertainty was initially worse, but after taking into account the constant offset, better results were achieved in each case, compared to the manual method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%