2000
DOI: 10.1006/rtph.2000.1384
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative Distribution Studies in Animals: Cross-Validation of Radioluminography versus Liquid-Scintillation Measurement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The MicroComputer Imaging Device (MCiD Analysis, version 7; Imaging Research Inc., ON, Canada) was used to quantify the concentrations of radioactivity in the calibration standards and tissues of whole-body sections, as described by Potchoiba et al (1995) for 14 C xenobiotics. The quantitation method described here was demonstrated to be as accurate and precise as the values obtained from gamma or liquid scintillation counter methods (Potchoiba et al, 1995(Potchoiba et al, , 1998Busch et al, 2000;Steinke et al, 2000). The lower limit of quantification was determined by the lower detected concentration in the calibration standards (0.01 Ci/ml).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The MicroComputer Imaging Device (MCiD Analysis, version 7; Imaging Research Inc., ON, Canada) was used to quantify the concentrations of radioactivity in the calibration standards and tissues of whole-body sections, as described by Potchoiba et al (1995) for 14 C xenobiotics. The quantitation method described here was demonstrated to be as accurate and precise as the values obtained from gamma or liquid scintillation counter methods (Potchoiba et al, 1995(Potchoiba et al, , 1998Busch et al, 2000;Steinke et al, 2000). The lower limit of quantification was determined by the lower detected concentration in the calibration standards (0.01 Ci/ml).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Sample preparation is of key importance particularly con- (Adapted with permission from Ref. 19) cerning the choice of matrix and application method with regard to the ultimate crystal size, which may become the limiting step for high spatial resolution imaging analysis. It is important to note that, for ME-SIMS, the ion yields will be determined by the matrix application process (i.e., tissue extraction and cocrystallization), and thus, there is a significant loss of surface specificity in relation to the regular "surface sputtering" SIMS.…”
Section: Sample Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that less than 25% of the initial 50 keV electrons are able to cross the protective layers. However, self-absorption Steinke et al, 2000) of the material on which the isotopes were spotted will also limit the transmission of these low energy electrons. In our experiments we used silica gel coated TLC plates (thickness of silica gel layer: 250 m).…”
Section: Properties Of the Tested Radioisotopesmentioning
confidence: 97%