2012
DOI: 10.1007/s12149-012-0666-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative evaluation improves specificity of myocardial perfusion SPECT in the assessment of functionally significant intermediate coronary artery stenoses: a comparative study with fractional flow reserve measurements

Abstract: Quantitative analysis of the myocardial perfusion SPECT increases the specificity in evaluating the significance of intermediate degree coronary lesions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering direct correlations between visual perfusion scores of Tl-201 MPI-IQ-SPECT and FFR, the moderately inverse correlation between rSDS and FFR was the most accurate both without and with CT-AC. These results agree with previous findings in which FFR correlated with reversible myocardial perfusion abnormalities identified by visual, [ 22 , 28 30 ] visual semiquantitative, [ 23 , 24 , 27 , 31 38 ] or automated quantitative, [ 5 , 35 , 39 ] MPI-SPECT, and the outcomes of regional myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) assessed by quantitative dynamic SPECT. [ 40 ]…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Considering direct correlations between visual perfusion scores of Tl-201 MPI-IQ-SPECT and FFR, the moderately inverse correlation between rSDS and FFR was the most accurate both without and with CT-AC. These results agree with previous findings in which FFR correlated with reversible myocardial perfusion abnormalities identified by visual, [ 22 , 28 30 ] visual semiquantitative, [ 23 , 24 , 27 , 31 38 ] or automated quantitative, [ 5 , 35 , 39 ] MPI-SPECT, and the outcomes of regional myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) assessed by quantitative dynamic SPECT. [ 40 ]…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The degree of heterogeneity was considered low (I 2 <50%), moderate (I 2 =50%-75%), or high (I 2 >75%). 9 Per imaging technique, possible publication bias was assed graphically by drawing funnel plots and statistically via the Egger test for funnel plot asymmetry. 10 Statistical analysis was performed using R version 2.10.2 combined with the package meta, version 3.5-0 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) and the dedicated meta-analysis software Meta-DiSc version 1.4 (Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain).…”
Section: Data Synthesis and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This small but clinically important improvement can be under interpreted because of the subjective scoring of different nuclear medicine specialists (16) . The diagnostic performance of these software packages was discussed in several studies (1,17) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%