2020
DOI: 10.1177/2325967120914568
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative Evaluation of Dynamic Lateral Meniscal Extrusion After Radial Tear Repair

Abstract: Background: Radial tears of the lateral meniscus frequently accompany acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries and lead to increased joint stress and pathological meniscal extrusion (ME). The dynamic behavior of the lateral meniscus after radial tear repair with respect to ME has not been described. Purpose: To quantitatively assess dynamic lateral ME after all-inside radial tear repair. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Patients who underwent ACL reconstruction and all-inside ra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main findings of the present study were that US-based measurement of lateral ME (1) yields highly reliable data, provided a standardized measurement protocol is used, but (2) overestimates lateral ME as compared to MRI measurements, resulting in the poor agreement of measurement results. Magnetic resonance imaging, the gold standard for meniscus evaluation [14], is time-consuming, costly and limited in that the acquisition of stress images [6,11,15] is not possible unless sophisticated loading devices are used. US, by contrast, is cost-effective, readily available and easily applicable in the standing position to obtain images under axial knee compression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The main findings of the present study were that US-based measurement of lateral ME (1) yields highly reliable data, provided a standardized measurement protocol is used, but (2) overestimates lateral ME as compared to MRI measurements, resulting in the poor agreement of measurement results. Magnetic resonance imaging, the gold standard for meniscus evaluation [14], is time-consuming, costly and limited in that the acquisition of stress images [6,11,15] is not possible unless sophisticated loading devices are used. US, by contrast, is cost-effective, readily available and easily applicable in the standing position to obtain images under axial knee compression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, ten consecutive patients presenting for a follow-up (FU) examination (minimum 12 months FU) after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and all-inside lateral meniscal radial tear repair were asked for participation for validity testing (Group II). Lateral ME measurement is of high interest in patients undergoing radial meniscal tear repair since a correlation between lateral ME and radial meniscal tear healing is assumed [ 15 ]. Both knees were examined in all subjects, so that data of 22 and 20 knees were available in Group I and Group II, respectively (Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Meniscal extrusion has gained interest in recent years and can be quantified by MRI or ultrasound [ 24 , 28 , 29 ]. It has been shown, that excessive meniscal extrusion is an indirect sign for radial tears as well as for meniscal root lesions [ 24 , 29 ]. Radial meniscal displacement of > 3 mm is often considered as a cut-off value from physiologic to pathologic extrusion.…”
Section: Anatomical and Biomechanical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%