2014
DOI: 10.1590/s2317-17822014000100014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative instruments used to assess children's sense of smell: a review article

Abstract: Purpose: To systematically gather from the literature available the quantitative instruments used to assess the sense of smell in studies carried out with children. Research strategy: The present study included a survey in the Pubmed and Bireme platforms and in the databases of MedLine, Lilacs, regional SciELO and Web of Science, followed by selection and critical analysis of the articles found and chosen. Selection criteria: We selected original articles related to the topic in question, conducted only w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There exist also other measures, less dependent on identification and age of the patient, like the MODT (match-to-sample odorant discrimination task) created by Richman and collaborators [ 53 ]. However, great variability in the methodology of the existing tests reduces the effectiveness and reliability of their results [ 54 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There exist also other measures, less dependent on identification and age of the patient, like the MODT (match-to-sample odorant discrimination task) created by Richman and collaborators [ 53 ]. However, great variability in the methodology of the existing tests reduces the effectiveness and reliability of their results [ 54 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore there is need for a reliable, valid and easy to use test for measuring olfactory function in children [28]. To date there are a few odor identification tests, which have been developed for children.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%