2020
DOI: 10.1111/bcp.14487
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative prediction of bone mineral density by using bone turnover markers in response to antiresorptive agents in postmenopausal osteoporosis: A model‐based meta‐analysis

Abstract: Aims This study aimed to predict time course of bone mineral density (BMD) by using corresponding response of bone turnover markers (BTMs) in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis under antiresorptive treatments. Methods Data were extracted from literature searches in accessible public database. Time courses of percent change from baseline in serum C‐telopeptide of type 1 collagen (sCTX) and N‐telopeptide of type 1 collagen were described by complex exponential onset models. The relationship between BTM chang… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…( 19 ) The reduction in plasma NTproCNP (median 1.4 pmol/L), expressed as percentage of values at 12 months (18 pmol/L, 8%), is not trivial, bearing in mind the multiple tissues potentially contributing to levels in plasma. ( 1 ) Notably, the increase in lumbar spine BMD (mean 4.7%) after resveratrol is similar to that found in meta‐analyses (4% to 5%) of the impact of 1 year of treatment with bisphosphonates, ( 23 ) which was associated with 50% to 70% fall in markers of both bone resorption (CTX) and formation (PINP). In the current randomized controlled trial (RCT) using within‐subject changes over 2 years, there was an associated 7% to 8% decrease in NTproCNP, no change in CTX, and a 4.8% increase in ALP.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…( 19 ) The reduction in plasma NTproCNP (median 1.4 pmol/L), expressed as percentage of values at 12 months (18 pmol/L, 8%), is not trivial, bearing in mind the multiple tissues potentially contributing to levels in plasma. ( 1 ) Notably, the increase in lumbar spine BMD (mean 4.7%) after resveratrol is similar to that found in meta‐analyses (4% to 5%) of the impact of 1 year of treatment with bisphosphonates, ( 23 ) which was associated with 50% to 70% fall in markers of both bone resorption (CTX) and formation (PINP). In the current randomized controlled trial (RCT) using within‐subject changes over 2 years, there was an associated 7% to 8% decrease in NTproCNP, no change in CTX, and a 4.8% increase in ALP.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…In contrast, bone turnover markers (BTMs) exhibit rapid responsiveness to physiological changes of bone and offer superior accuracy in reflecting alterations in bone cell metabolism. They serve as reliable predictors of bone loss and fracture risk, and contribute significantly to the diagnosis of osteoporosis [25,26]. Therefore, combining BMD and BTMs [27] to evaluate bone status by integrating the advantages of both is a promising method for predicting the risk of osteoporosis and fractures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, quantitative pharmacological methods for dose optimization have become the most ideal and efficient methods. Although a dose-bone turnover markers (BTMs) - bone mineral density (BMD) model has been established after a single dose ( Pillai et al, 2004 ; Mori et al, 2018 ; Wu et al, 2021 ), the tolerance model has not been integrated, there is an error in predicting multiple doses, and dose optimization has not been performed in combination with APR. In addition, the existing models all use one or two BTMs to drive BMD to evaluate the change in BMD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%