2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.05.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitatively exploring the future of renewable portfolio standard in the Korean electricity sector via a bottom-up energy model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An ideal design of the RPS framework involves some consideration of balance among environmental governance, renewable energy development goals, and implementation costs and must align with toplevel energy policies [33,34]. The design should also relate to the interactions among the quota indicators, market structure, and market entities in view of not distorting the attendant goals and causing unnecessary loss of social benefits [35].…”
Section: Design Concept Of the Renewable Portfolio Standards Mechanis...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An ideal design of the RPS framework involves some consideration of balance among environmental governance, renewable energy development goals, and implementation costs and must align with toplevel energy policies [33,34]. The design should also relate to the interactions among the quota indicators, market structure, and market entities in view of not distorting the attendant goals and causing unnecessary loss of social benefits [35].…”
Section: Design Concept Of the Renewable Portfolio Standards Mechanis...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, Reference [17] conducted a preliminary evaluation of Korea's RPS introduction by comparing Feed-in tariffs (FIT) and RPS in terms of capacity expansion, technological progress, cost-effectiveness, and market risk. Furthermore, References [4,18] investigated the current RPS policy in Korea, identified problems, and derived a future outlook based on quantitative indicators. Reference [18] conducted a virtual evaluation of current RPS policy in Korea based on a bottom-up model.…”
Section: Renewable Portfolio Standards (Rps)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, References [4,18] investigated the current RPS policy in Korea, identified problems, and derived a future outlook based on quantitative indicators. Reference [18] conducted a virtual evaluation of current RPS policy in Korea based on a bottom-up model. Reference [4] analyzed an optimal portfolio for 2050 in the Korean power sector.…”
Section: Renewable Portfolio Standards (Rps)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At present, the research on RPS mainly includes the following aspects: (1) Analysis of the evolution of RPS at the institutional level. Policy design and impact analysis [ 6 ], which is reflected in how to coordinate RPS with existing top-level energy policies [ 7 ]; summary of experience in quota policies [ 8 ], which is reflected in the reasonable design of performance mechanisms [ 9 ], and setting quota indicators fairly and reasonably [ 10 , 11 ]; analysis of policy effectiveness evaluation [ 12 , 13 ], which is reflected in the implementation effect of electricity price subsidies based on the development of electricity price mechanisms [ 14 ], and the implementation difficulties and price prediction under the green certificate pricing mechanism [ 15 ]. (2) Evaluation of the effectiveness of RPS combined with other emission reduction policies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%