Quantity judgments of sequentially presented food items by capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella)

Abstract

Recent assessments have shown that capuchin monkeys, like chimpanzees and other Old World primate species, are sensitive to quantitative differences between sets of visible stimuli. In the present study, we examined capuchins' performance in a more sophisticated quantity judgment task that required the ability to form representations of food quantities while viewing the quantities only one piece at a time. In three experiments, we presented monkeys with the choice between two sets of discrete homogeneous food items and allowed the monkeys to consume the set of their choice. In Experiments 1 and 2, monkeys compared an entirely visible food set to a second set, presented item-by-item into an opaque container. All monkeys exhibited high accuracy in choosing the larger set, even when the entirely visible set was presented last, preventing the use of one-to-one item correspondence to compare quantities. In Experiment 3, monkeys compared two sets that were each presented item-by-item into opaque containers, but at different rates to control for temporal cues. Some monkeys performed well in this experiment, though others exhibited near-chance performance, suggesting that this species' ability to form representations of food quantities may be limited compared to previously tested species such as chimpanzees. Overall, these findings support the analog magnitude model of quantity representation as an explanation for capuchin monkeys' quantification of sequentially presented food items.

Numerosity representations in crows obey the Weber–Fechner law

“…In this study, the crows needed more than twice the numerical distance to reach similar performance accuracy as monkeys and humans with similar dot displays [45,46,57,64,65]. This inferior discrimination performance may indicate more limited numerical capacities in crows, which was also indicated for other songbirds [66].…”

"Counting" by pigeons: Discrimination of the number of biologically relevant sequential events

“…These relativenumerosity-discrimination experiments typically show that accuracy is a function of both the relative difference between the two numerosities and the magnitude of the numerosities, a property that obeys Weber's law of scalar variability. That is, both human and nonhuman subjects' accuracy at judging the difference between 5 and 10 items is similar to their accuracy at judging the difference between 20 and 40 items (Brannon, 2006;Evans, Beran, Harris, & Rice, 2009;Feigenson et al, 2004;Gallistel, 1989;Nieder, 2005;Whalen, Gallistel, n & Gelman, 1999). Although much research has been done with the simultaneous procedure, Rilling (1993) …”

Comparing children’s Homo sapiens and chimpanzees’ Pan troglodytes quantity judgments of sequentially presented sets of items

“…Across all set sizes, success was determined by the ratio between sets, not on the basis of the magnitude of the sets. Subsequent use of the one-by-one sequential presentation method with rhesus monkeys (Beran, 2007), capuchin monkeys (Beran et al, 2008;Evans et al, 2009), gorillas, bonobos, and orangutans (Hanus and Call, 2007), and even adult humans who were prevented from counting the arrays (Beran et al, 2006) indicated this same relation between performance and ratio between sets. This suggests that a similar mechanism may be operating across species to facilitate performance on this task.…”