2014
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stu1373
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quasi-simultaneous multicolour optical variability of S5 0716+714

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
66
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
4
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…de Diego 2010; Joshi et al 2011;Goyal et al 2012;Hu et al 2014;Agarwal & Gupta 2015;Xiong et al 2016). F value is calculated as…”
Section: Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…de Diego 2010; Joshi et al 2011;Goyal et al 2012;Hu et al 2014;Agarwal & Gupta 2015;Xiong et al 2016). F value is calculated as…”
Section: Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite it being very common to use C-statistics, de Diego (2010) has pointed out that it has severe problems. F test is thought to be the proper statistics to quantify variability (e.g., de Diego 2010; Joshi et al 2011;Goyal et al 2012;Hu et al 2014;Agarwal & Gupta 2015 , where bl n and * n are the number of degrees of freedom for the blazar and comparison star, respectively ( N 1 n = -), and α is the significance level set as 0.01 (2.6σ). If the average F value is larger than the critical value, the blazar is variable at a confidence level of 99%.…”
Section: Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to obtain good S/N, our exposure times were chosen to be from 150 to 400 s. Considering the time interval of 10 minutes within each group (because 10 minutes is a safe time interval to bin data sharing similar flux characteristics), we bin the data in a group of three observations. This method is used only for light curves with more than 9 observations on a given night, n n a in the F-statistics, where k 1 1 n = -(k is the number of groups), N k 2 n = -(N is the number of measurements), and α is the significance level (Hu et al 2014). Our analysis results on IDV are shown in Table 5.…”
Section: Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…S5 0716+714 has also been detected by γ-ray instruments such as the Compton EGRET, AGILE, Fermi-LAT satellites and also by the MAGIC Cherenkov telescope (see, e.g., [11][12][13][14] and references therein). In particular, there have been numerous optical microvariability studies of S5 0716+714 which reported many interesting results, including achromatic behavior, red noise-type power spectra, and in some cases, correlation between flux and polarization degree [15][16][17][18]. In this proceeding, we present the summary of our optical microvariability studies on S5 0716+714, over the past few years, based on multifrequency photo-polarimetric Whole Earth Blazar Telescope (WEBT) [18,19] observation campaigns in 2009 and 2014 (the data collected by the WEBT Collaboration are stored in the WEBT archive; for questions regarding their availability, please contact the WEBT President Massimo Villata: villata@oato.inaf.it).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%