2017
DOI: 10.1590/1679-78253866
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quasi-Static Crushing and Energy Absorption Characteristics of Thin-Walled Cylinders with Geometric Discontinuities of Various Aspect Ratios

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors selected V = 2, 5, and 10 mm/min to ensure the absence of the dynamic effect while testing. [60] Other reason for selecting hole diameters of 6, 12, and 18 mm is to keep enough margins from the tube sides. The same reason was taken into consideration when selecting the location of the hole (P/L = 0.25, 0.5, and 0.75).…”
Section: Numerical/ Experimentalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The authors selected V = 2, 5, and 10 mm/min to ensure the absence of the dynamic effect while testing. [60] Other reason for selecting hole diameters of 6, 12, and 18 mm is to keep enough margins from the tube sides. The same reason was taken into consideration when selecting the location of the hole (P/L = 0.25, 0.5, and 0.75).…”
Section: Numerical/ Experimentalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12,47,53,55,58,59] Others adapted V = 5 mm/ min. [50,54,[60][61][62] While, Han et al, [63] Sathishkumar et al [64] , Abd El-baky et al, [29,65,66] Alshahrani et al [67] adapted V = 10 mm/min in their studies and so on. So, the authors tried to find the effect of crosshead speed on the perforated glass/epoxy thin-walled tubes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors selected V = 2, 5, and 10 mm/min to ensure the absence of the dynamic effect while testing. 56 Other reason for selecting hole diameters of 6, 12, and 18 mm is to keep sufficient margins from the tube sides. The same reason was taken into consideration when selecting the position of the hole (P/L = 0.25, 0.5, and 0.75).…”
Section: Numerical/ Experimentalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For crosshead speed, Kathiresan et al, 10,63 Liu et al, 65,71 Kathiresan, 60 adapted V = 2 mm/min. Song et al, 72 Baaskaran et al, 56 Elahi et al, 73 Özbek et al 64 adapted V = 5 mm/min. Han et al, 49 Sathishkumar et al, 70 Abd El-baky et al, 26,74,75 Alshahrani et al 76 adapted V = 10 mm/min.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the impact or crash events, the thin-walled energy-absorbing structures can often be used to absorb the more impact kinetic energy and to guarantee the occupants' safety through the crashworthy design, which can play the major roles in automobile or aerospace application. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] Various thin-walled energyabsorbing structures have been designed and researched, such as circular tubes, [9][10][11][12][13][14] square tubes, [15][16][17][18] flat plates, 19,20 conical shells, 21,22 C channels, [23][24][25][26][27] I-shaped cross-section structures 28 and sinusoidal specimens, [29][30][31][32] etc. Compared with the metal thin-walled structures, the composite thin-walled energy-absorbing structures have been widely used because of the advantages of higher specific strength, higher specific stiffness, and higher specific energy absorption (SEA), which can absorb a large amount of impact kinetic energy in the controlled progressive failure modes during the impact or crash event.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%