1999
DOI: 10.1080/00268979909482996
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quasidegenerate second-order perturbation corrections to single-excitation configuration interaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
53
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the TD-DFT part, we have selected the M06-2X functional [56] and used the so-called ultrafine pruned (99,590) grid. The scaled opposite spin CIS(D) [SOS-CIS(D)] [24], SOS-CIS(D0) [57], ADC(2) [7] and SOS-ADC(2) [8,9] transition energies were determined with the Q-Chem package using the Resolution of the Identity (RI) scheme [58,59]. For the most demanding cases, TURBOMOLE was also used to perform some ADC(2) calculations [60].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the TD-DFT part, we have selected the M06-2X functional [56] and used the so-called ultrafine pruned (99,590) grid. The scaled opposite spin CIS(D) [SOS-CIS(D)] [24], SOS-CIS(D0) [57], ADC(2) [7] and SOS-ADC(2) [8,9] transition energies were determined with the Q-Chem package using the Resolution of the Identity (RI) scheme [58,59]. For the most demanding cases, TURBOMOLE was also used to perform some ADC(2) calculations [60].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vertical excitation energies for all systems were calculated using the configuration interaction singles (CIS) with perturbative second order corrections (CIS(D)). 50 30 CIS states were included in the calculation to ensure that the CT states are present. Even though this approach is not as accurate as ADC(2) it shows similar qualitative results as will be discussed below.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CIS method is in widespread use. However, it is known to give an insufficient description in many applications [26], and we include the comparison to show that the ROKS/ROSS, and TDDFT methods are generally superior to the CIS method, with a smaller and comparable computational effort, respectively. Accurate excited state geometries are not easily accessible in experiment.…”
Section: Adiabatic Energiesmentioning
confidence: 99%