1993
DOI: 10.1016/0362-546x(93)90124-b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quenching on the boundary

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

8
35
0
3

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
8
35
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It is worth mentioning that for ␥ ϭ 1, these results had been established in [6]. However, from technical point of view, the results of [6] are somewhat different from those in [5].…”
Section: Posing the Problemmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is worth mentioning that for ␥ ϭ 1, these results had been established in [6]. However, from technical point of view, the results of [6] are somewhat different from those in [5].…”
Section: Posing the Problemmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…However, from technical point of view, the results of [6] are somewhat different from those in [5]. On the one hand, in Theorem A of [6], no assumptions are imposed on the initial data, except the compatibility conditions. On the other hand, in Theorem B of [6], more restrictive conditions are assumed.…”
Section: Posing the Problemmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Problems (1.2) and (1.3) have been intensively studied over the past few years. For details, see [1,3,4,6] and the references cited therein.…”
Section: Introduction In This Paper We Consider the Following Initimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As in [8], observe that in problem (1.1) the singular source term may become singular if u(x, t) → 1 − as (x, t) → (x * , T ), where x * is a quenching point in [0, 1] and T is a quenching time in (0, ∞). On the other hand, the outflux −u −β (1, t) may also become singular in some finite time (see [2], [3] and [9]). Here, we discuss the second situation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%