Quo Vadis “Malpractice” Profesi Dokter Dalam Budaya Hukum Indonesia

Kolamawati, Veronica; Padjajaran, Fakultas Hukum

doi:10.23920/jbmh.v3n1.1

Cited by 2 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, PID can be claimed as a condition where physicians are responsible for the demand of 'unnecessary' supporting examinations such as advanced medical technology, laboratories, and other additional examinations. This situation may arise from the development of defensive medicine, a distortion of medical care triggered by malpractice suit nowadays (Komalawati, 2018). Physicians try to avoid and defend themselves from the risk of indictment by playing safe and being overly careful by undertaking excessive diagnostic tests to ensure that they will not be charged from medico-legal suits.…”

Section: Defining Physician-induced Demand (Pid)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Further, it is essential to remember that this asymmetry of information is protected and bridged by informed consent from the legal aspect (Komalawati, 2018) (Pugh, 2020). It is clear that all the doctor's suggestions do not have to be approved by the patient.…”

Section: Looking At the Cause Of Pid: Asymmetry Informationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The accusation of PID as the leading cause of the increasing demand in healthcare may not seem to acknowledge the existence of legal protection for both patients and doctors. Years ago, doctors were indeed claimed as "God's arm," they are highly respected, and whatever they said or advice, the patients will follow it as they put their trust in doctors (Murdi & Supanto, 2019) (Komalawati, 2018). However, in this digital era where information and data are easy to obtain, patients are getting critical and anxious about malpractice, unnecessary examination, and doctors' negligence.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, in this digital era where information and data are easy to obtain, patients are getting critical and anxious about malpractice, unnecessary examination, and doctors' negligence. Similarly, doctors are aware of medical law and ethics as they know that their patients can sue them easily (Komalawati, 2018). The relationship between doctors and patients is sacred, based on trust with a noble purpose.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Nevertheless, the gap in information between doctors and patients in a therapeutic transaction may lead to PID (Johnson, 2014) (Hou, 2018). Therefore, to avoid any missed ethical behavior, malpractice, and PID, medical law and medical ethics play a vital role (Komalawati, 2018). The study regarding how medical law alludes to the PID is hardly founded.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Medicolegal Perspective on Physician-Induced Demand Issue

Putri¹,

Widyasari

Musabula³

et al. 2021

BESTUUR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study sheds light on the extent to which the medical law protects patients' rights from Physician-Induced Demand behavior. This study shows that the term of Physician-Induced Demand has not been recognized in health regulations. Meanwhile, some often fail to recall that medical law has protected patients’ right in the therapeutic transaction between doctor and patient through Act No. 29 of 2004; Minister of Health Regulations number 11 Year 2017; Act No. 44 of 2009, Civil Code and Act No. 36 of 2009. In order to reduce Physician-Induced Demand, establishing a guideline of good clinical practice, including the informed-consent guideline is urgently needed. Government should also control the quality and cost of healthcare providers as well as adequate payment system for physicians.Keywords: Physician-Induced Demand; Medical Law; Legal Protection of Patient.

show abstract

Section: Defining Physician-induced Demand (Pid)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Looking At the Cause Of Pid: Asymmetry Informationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Medicolegal Perspective on Physician-Induced Demand Issue

Putri¹,

Widyasari

Musabula³

et al. 2021

BESTUUR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Exit Plan Terhadap Clerical Eror Pada Putusan Yang Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap: Sebuah Upaya Preventif Terwujudnya Putusan Non-Executable

Anand

Nugraha²

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aims to firstly analyze clerical errors in court decisions that have permanent legal force and secondly analyze related legal remedies for clerical errors in court decisions that have permanent legal force. This research is a doctrinal research with a statute approach, a conceptual approach, and a case approach. The results of this study are that first, a clerical error in a court decision that has permanent legal force is an error that is minor in nature or in the form of an accident and is not related to the substance of the judge’s legal considerations and this error can be corrected by the court, even after the judge makes a decision. . Second, legal remedies that can be filed against typos in decisions that have legal force consist of various kinds, but generally the right one is through an application. It is based on nature, complexity, time, cost, and evidentiary.Keywords: Clerical Eror; Non-Executable Judgement; Legal Action. AbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk pertama menganalisis kekeliruan pengetikan (clerical eror) dalam putusan pengadilan yang berkekuatan hukum tetap dan kedua menganalisis terkait permohonan terhadap adanya kekeliruan pengetikan (clerical eror) dalam putusan pengadilan yang berkekuatan hukum tetap. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum (doctrinal research) dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach), pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach), dan pendekatan kasus (case approach). Adapun hasil dari penelitian ini adalah pertama kekeliruan pengetikan (clerical eror) pada putusan pengadilan yang berkekuatan hukum tetap adalah kesalahan yang sifatnya ringan atau berbentuk ketidaksengajaan dan tidak berkaitan dengan substansi pertimbangan hukum hakim dan kesalahan ini dapat diperbaiki oleh pengadilan, meskipun setelah hakim menjatuhkan putusan. Kedua, exit plan yang dapat diajukan terhadap adanya kekeliruan pengetikan pada putusan yang berkekuatan hukum terdiri dari beraneka ragam, namun umumnya yang tepat adalah melalui permohonan. Hal ini didasarkan pada hakikat, kompleksitas, waktu, biaya, dan pembuktian. Kata Kunci: Clerical Eror; Putusan Non-Executable; Exit Plan.

show abstract

Quo Vadis “Malpractice” Profesi Dokter Dalam Budaya Hukum Indonesia

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

Medicolegal Perspective on Physician-Induced Demand Issue

Medicolegal Perspective on Physician-Induced Demand Issue

Exit Plan Terhadap Clerical Eror Pada Putusan Yang Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap: Sebuah Upaya Preventif Terwujudnya Putusan Non-Executable

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About