2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.08.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Racial and ethnic differences in human papillomavirus positivity and risk factors among low-income women in Federally Qualified Health Centers in the United States

Abstract: Reasons for racial/ethnic disparities in HPV infection are unclear. This study assessed racial/ethnic differences in and risk factors for HPV positivity among low-income women. Data were collected from 984 low-income women visiting Federally Qualified Health Centers across Illinois (2009–2011). Pearson chi square and Logistic regression analyses were used to examine associations with HPV positivity. Our results showed Mexican-born Hispanics had the lowest HPV positivity (16%), followed by non-Hispanic whites (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
23
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
6
23
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…45 The higher prevalence of HPV among Haitians is consistent with our prior work, but the reasons for this difference remain unclear. 44,46 Although screening for cervical cancer using HPV testing is gaining increased acceptance, the United States Preventive Services Task Force has still not endorsed it as a primary screening test for cervical cancer. Given a lack of specific guidelines and limited prior provider awareness and knowledge about HPV self-sampling as an alternative approach to cervical cancer screening, we had expected provider attitudes to be more heterogeneous.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…45 The higher prevalence of HPV among Haitians is consistent with our prior work, but the reasons for this difference remain unclear. 44,46 Although screening for cervical cancer using HPV testing is gaining increased acceptance, the United States Preventive Services Task Force has still not endorsed it as a primary screening test for cervical cancer. Given a lack of specific guidelines and limited prior provider awareness and knowledge about HPV self-sampling as an alternative approach to cervical cancer screening, we had expected provider attitudes to be more heterogeneous.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 Black and Hispanic women have higher rates of HPV infection, cervical cancer incidence, and cervical cancer mortality compared with other racial and ethnic groups. 1,[6][7][8][9][10] The risk of death from cervical cancer for black women is twice that of white women in the U.S., and the 5-year survival rate for all stages of cervical cancer is 61% for black women compared with 72% for white women.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the analyzed samples, eight (0.13%) were considered inadequate after genotyping. HPV results were grouped as follows: positive for any HPV type, positive for 13 high-risk HPV (16,18,31,33,35,39,45,51,52,56,58,59,68), positive for other HPV (6,11,26,40,42,53,54,55,61,62,64,66,67,69,70,71,72,73,81,82 [IS39], 83, 84, 89 [CP6108]), positive for vaccine types (quadrivalent: 6, 11, 16, 18; nonavalent: 6, 11, 16, 18, 31, 33, 45, 52, 58), and multiple types (more than one HPV type).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%