Radiance FN: A New Soft Tissue Filler

Sklar, Jeffrey A.; WHITE, SOREN M.

doi:10.1111/j.1524-4725.2004.30214.x

Cited by 77 publications

(55 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…2, above). A relatively high incidence of nodule formation [103][104][105] has led to caution in its use in lip augmentation; however, true granuloma formation in the above sense has been reported only twice to the main clinical investigator (M. H. Graivier) in approximately 35,000 patients treated between 2002 and 2004 in the United States. Two male patients with acne received Radiesse in many depressed scars in both cheeks and developed foreign body granulomas mainly in three areas of 3 ϫ 2 ϫ 0.5 cm, dimensions that were far beyond those of the injected sites.…”

Section: Calcium-hydroxylapatite Microspheres (Radiance/radiesse)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Foreign Body Granulomas after All Injectable Dermal Fillers: Part 1. Possible Causes

Lemperle

Gauthier-Hazan

Wolters

et al. 2009

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

223

243

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Summary Genuine granuloma formation following implantation of injectable dermal fillers is a rare complication, with incidences ranging from one in 100 patients (1 percent) to one in 5000 (0.02 percent). Foreign body granulomas occur several months to years after injection at all implantation sites at the same time. Without treatment, they may grow to the size of beans, remain virtually unchanged for some years, and then resolve spontaneously. Three clinical and histologic types of foreign body granulomas can be distinguished: 1. Cystic granulomas (synonyms: inflammatory, palisading, collagenolytic): these are caused mainly by injected biological gels such as collagens and hyaluronic acids. Their clinical signs are fluctuation (sterile abscess), extreme redness, and induration. Cystic granulomas are small and superficial, occur within the first year, and disappear spontaneously within another year. They are surrounded by a significant number of giant cells. 2. Edematous granulomas (synonym: lipogranuloma): these are caused by artificial fluids such as silicone and polyacrylamides. They appear suddenly years after injection with extensive swelling and are surrounded and infiltrated by mononuclear and inflammatory cells. 3. Sclerosing granulomas (synonyms: sarcoidal and xanthelasmic): these are caused by particulate injectables composed of polymethylmethacrylate, polylactic acid, hydroxyethylmethacrylate, calcium-hydroxylapatite, or dextran microspheres. Sclerosing granulomas occur generally 6 months to 3 years after implantation and are visible, often bluish confined nodules. Histologically, the implant is infiltrated by many macrophages and giant cells, fibroblasts, and collagen fibers but few inflammatory cells. Permanent implants are not characterized by a higher rate of foreign body granuloma per se than temporary implants; however, their clinical appearance is more pronounced and their persistence longer if not treated adequately. (Plast.

show abstract

Section: Calcium-hydroxylapatite Microspheres (Radiance/radiesse)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Foreign Body Granulomas after All Injectable Dermal Fillers: Part 1. Possible Causes

Lemperle

Gauthier-Hazan

Wolters

et al. 2009

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

223

243

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Bu materyal ile dudaklara işlem yapıldığında %20 oranında nodül formasyonu saptanmıştır. 42 Materyal radyoopak olduğu için radyografide görüntü verebileceği unutulmamalıdır.…”

Section: Sentetik Materyallerunclassified

İntraoral Tedavi̇leri̇ Tamamlayici Peri̇oral Bölgedeki̇ Esteti̇k Çalişmalar

Orbak¹,

Öztürk²

2015

Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Also, in contrast to silicone, calcium hydroxylapatite has a 1:1 rate of injection to augmentation, requiring no posttreatment monitoring for additional augmentation. 8 In this pilot study, we demonstrated that calcium hydroxylapatite may be used safely in the nose for postrhinoplasty contour defects. Postsurgical injection of calcium hydroxylapatite has the potential to add a degree of finesse to a postrhinoplasty result: symmetry may be improved, a natural curve or line may be smoothed, or a subtle depression can be filled.…”

Section: Commentmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…7 It is biocompatible, yet shown to be long lasting without being permanent. 7,8 The use of calcium hydroxylapatite for postrhinoplasty nasal contour defects has not been previously described in the published literature. We believe that injectable calcium hydroxylapatite may fit the criteria for a nearly ideal filler of the nose.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Calcium hydroxylapatite is the inorganic component of bone and teeth and is thus inert and nonantigenic. Calcium hydroxylapatite in this form has been approved for vocal fold augmentation, 7 for the treatment of urinary stress incontinence, 8 as a radiologic marker, 8 and very recently for facial augmentation. 9 Calcium hydroxylapatite has been described and widely used for facial soft tissue augmentation since 2004, mostly for the lips, nasolabial folds, tear trough, and mental creases.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation