Radiation Dose and Image Quality in Pediatric Neck CT

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Optimization of pediatric neck CT protocols is of critical importance in order to maintain good diagnostic image quality while reducing the radiation burden. Our aim was to evaluate the image quality of pediatric neck CT studies before and after the implementation of a low radiation dose protocol. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 179 pediatric neck CT studies, 75 before and 104 after the implementation of low-dose protocols, performed in children 0-16 years of age. The 2 cohorts were divided into 3 age groups, 0-4, 5-9, and 10-16 years. The signal-to-noise ratio was calculated using the axial image through the true vocal folds. Three neuroradiologists assessed the image quality of the same CT scan using a 5-point scoring system. We compared the CT dose index volume, dose-length product, image-quality ratings, and SNR of studies conducted at baseline and with low-dose protocols. RESULTS: Image-quality ratings were lower in the low-dose than in the baseline cohort in children 10-16 years of age, but not in children 0-4 and 5-9 years of age. The SNR was lower in the low-dose cohort than in the baseline cohort in children 0-4 and 10-16 years of age, but not in children 5-9 years of age. Despite the decrease in image-quality scores in older children, 97% of the studies (73/75) in the baseline cohort and 96% of studies (100/104) in the low-dose cohort were considered of sufficient image quality. CONCLUSIONS: Images acquired with the low-dose CT protocols were deemed to be of sufficient quality for making a clinical diagnosis. Our initial results suggest that there may be an opportunity for further radiation dose reduction without compromising diagnostic image quality using iterative reconstruction algorithms.

Variation in tube voltage for pediatric neck 64VCT: Effect on radiation dose and image quality

“…an ED reduction of 68.58% and 38.03%, respectively, relative to that achieved with the standard 120-kVp protocol. The dose reductions obtained in the present study were smaller than previously reported values [16].…”