2017
DOI: 10.1002/ccd.26911
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiation dose benchmarks in pediatric cardiac catheterization: A prospective multi‐center C3PO‐QI study

Abstract: This study updates previously established benchmarks to reflect QI efforts over time. These thresholds can be applied for quality measurement and comparison. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
2
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
26
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the increased lifetime risk of cancer associated with exposure to low‐dose ionizing radiation, it is important to consider potential for additional radiation exposure combining CTA and catheterization . In recent years, improvements in technology and protocols have significantly reduced the radiation exposure during a CT, now with effective doses of around 1 mSv .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Given the increased lifetime risk of cancer associated with exposure to low‐dose ionizing radiation, it is important to consider potential for additional radiation exposure combining CTA and catheterization . In recent years, improvements in technology and protocols have significantly reduced the radiation exposure during a CT, now with effective doses of around 1 mSv .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, improvements in technology and protocols have significantly reduced the radiation exposure during a CT, now with effective doses of around 1 mSv . Currently no benchmark radiation dose is available for DS placement; however, in children <1 year of age, effective radiation doses from chest CTA are a fraction of those from diagnostic catheterizations with median doses of 0.76 mSv for CT compared to 13.4 mSv for catheterization . Taken together, the risk from the small additional radiation dose of CTA in this patient population may be acceptable given the benefit to procedural planning and outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In pediatrics, the stochastic risk of radiation is the main concern rather than deterministic effects 4. DAP is the product of the air kerma dose and the cross-sectional area exposed to the X-ray beam (μGy-M 2 ) 5.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From these data, DAP per body weight (μG•m 2 /kg) was calculated as a surrogate for energy delivered indexed by body weight. Although DAP/kg has been reported in previous studies and seems to be a valuable metric, it has never been validated as a method of reporting radiation exposure but was calculated for comparisons to published contemporary benchmarks [12].…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…us, the primary aim of this study was to define radiation exposure for diagnostic and interventional catheterizations from a larger representative sample of pediatric CHD patients from multiple centers and to compare these exposure data to published contemporary benchmarks [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%