1995
DOI: 10.1109/8.467652
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiation of printed antennas with a coplanar waveguide feed

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The combination of a CPW feed line, a fractal patch, and a vertical strip excites the antenna. The CPW feed line provides wider bandwidth, better impedance matching possibilities, and easier fabrication 28 . The feed line is designed for 50 Ω (feed width, w f = 1.28 mm, and the gap between the ground plane and the center stripline, g f = 0.3 mm).…”
Section: Antenna Configuration and Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The combination of a CPW feed line, a fractal patch, and a vertical strip excites the antenna. The CPW feed line provides wider bandwidth, better impedance matching possibilities, and easier fabrication 28 . The feed line is designed for 50 Ω (feed width, w f = 1.28 mm, and the gap between the ground plane and the center stripline, g f = 0.3 mm).…”
Section: Antenna Configuration and Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CPW feed line provides wider bandwidth, better impedance matching possibilities, and easier fabrication. 28 The feed line is designed for 50 Ω (feed width, w f = 1.28 mm, and the gap between the ground plane and the center stripline, g f = 0.3 mm). The rectangular dielectric resonator (RDR) is made up of alumina material (relative permittivity, ε r, DR = 9.8 and tanδ = 0.02) mounted on top of a fractal patch at the end of the center feed line.…”
Section: Antenna Configuration and Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aforementioned challenges can be addressed using patch antenna designs because they have a low profile and are lightweight and cheap. In addition, they have low radiation loss, easy matching of input impedance and are easily integrated with electronic devices [4]. However, their main limitation is their narrow bandwidth, low gains and low efficiency at S-band, i.e., 2.40 GHz [5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%