1990
DOI: 10.1080/09553009014550961
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiation Protection Guidelines for the Skin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A separate model was fitted for each time period restricted to subjects who were between 15 and 65 years at some time during that period. Subjects with missing data and subjects who had never worked as a radiologic technologist were classified into separate categories (estimates not shown).- 2 Trend test based on the significance of the slope estimate using categorical scores (1, 2, 3 or 1, 2, 3, 4). started working before 1940 as well as during the 1940s and 1950s.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A separate model was fitted for each time period restricted to subjects who were between 15 and 65 years at some time during that period. Subjects with missing data and subjects who had never worked as a radiologic technologist were classified into separate categories (estimates not shown).- 2 Trend test based on the significance of the slope estimate using categorical scores (1, 2, 3 or 1, 2, 3, 4). started working before 1940 as well as during the 1940s and 1950s.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on information on UVR exposure, mean annual UVR exposure estimates in Robertson-Berger units were categorized into quartiles separately for adult and childhood exposure among all cohort members. Trend tests were based on the significance of the slope estimates using categorical scores (1,2,3,4). RRs for IR exposure were adjusted for gender, pigmentation characteristics and mean annual UVR exposure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, risks for sunexposed areas of skin differ from those that are shielded. The risk estimate for skin cancer is very dependent on the selection of the skin site, the total risks for both UVR exposed and shielded skin is about twice that of shielded skin in non exposed skin areas 9 . According to the existing standard, maximal dose to the skin over the career may not exceed 1200 cSv.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%