1993
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.47.15283
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiative correction to x-ray scattering and its relevance in condensed-matter experiments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1994
1994
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The frad contribution was found to be "~0.001f0 (Rocchi & Sacchetti, 1993), i.e. smaller than the experimental errors and the nuclear Thomson contribution, fu = 0.008r0, was neglected as well.…”
Section: Coppermentioning
confidence: 98%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The frad contribution was found to be "~0.001f0 (Rocchi & Sacchetti, 1993), i.e. smaller than the experimental errors and the nuclear Thomson contribution, fu = 0.008r0, was neglected as well.…”
Section: Coppermentioning
confidence: 98%
“…f~LE is the anomalous-scattering contribution as deduced from the dispersion-relation approach (Gell-Mann et al, 1954) and assumed to be independent of the site. frad(G, S) is the contribution due to the so-called radiative corrections (Sacchetti, 1987;Rocchi & Sacchetti, 1993;Jauch & Rohrlich, 1980), which turns out to be proportional to fro(G, s) (Rocchi & Sacchetti, 1993). Actually, additional contributions are expected when the photon energy increases, namely Delbruck scattering and nuclear giant resonance, however, they are almost completely negligible in the energy range of the experiments performed to date (Sacchetti, 1987;Jauch & Rohrlich, 1980 …”
Section: Analysis Of Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations