Handbook of Sea‐Level Research 2015
DOI: 10.1002/9781118452547.ch23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiocarbon dating and calibration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Seventeen samples analyzed in previous studies (see Toth et al, 2018) were dated using standard radiometric dating at the University of Miami Radiocarbon Laboratory, Beta Analytic, Inc., or Geochron Laboratories. We report conventional 14 C ages, corrected for fractionation of 13 C. The δ 13 C of the samples was either measured by University of California, Davis Stable Isotope Laboratory or NOSAMS or, if not measured, was assumed to be 0 ± 3‰ (Törnqvist, Rosenheim, Hu, & Fernandez, 2015). The conventional radiocarbon ages were calibrated in Calib 7.0.2 (https://calib.org/calib/; Reimer & Reimer, 2001) using time-varying estimates of the local reservoir age, ΔR, for the nearshore and open-ocean environments of the FKRT (Toth et al, 2017a(Toth et al, , 2017b).…”
Section: Radiometric Dating Of Holocene Reef Coresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seventeen samples analyzed in previous studies (see Toth et al, 2018) were dated using standard radiometric dating at the University of Miami Radiocarbon Laboratory, Beta Analytic, Inc., or Geochron Laboratories. We report conventional 14 C ages, corrected for fractionation of 13 C. The δ 13 C of the samples was either measured by University of California, Davis Stable Isotope Laboratory or NOSAMS or, if not measured, was assumed to be 0 ± 3‰ (Törnqvist, Rosenheim, Hu, & Fernandez, 2015). The conventional radiocarbon ages were calibrated in Calib 7.0.2 (https://calib.org/calib/; Reimer & Reimer, 2001) using time-varying estimates of the local reservoir age, ΔR, for the nearshore and open-ocean environments of the FKRT (Toth et al, 2017a(Toth et al, , 2017b).…”
Section: Radiometric Dating Of Holocene Reef Coresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we reconstruct late Holocene RSL using geological and tide-gauge data coupled with a new salt-marsh based reconstruction from the central-eastern coast of Croatia that bridges the gap between late Holocene and modern sea-level data. Salt-marsh environments afford a unique ability providing near continuous, decimeter vertical Medioli, 1978, 1980;Horton and Edwards, 2006) and sub-century temporal resolution (T€ ornqvist et al, 2015;Corbett and Walsh, 2015;Marshall, 2015). Their use in reconstructing RSL is well established across regions in Northern (Gehrels et al, 2005;Kemp et al, 2013a;Barlow et al, 2014;Saher et al, 2015) and Southern Hemispheres (Gehrels et al, 2008(Gehrels et al, , 2012Strachan et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gas bench ages were calibrated with the Marine13 curve (Reimer et al 2013) with the standard global 400 year-marine reservoir applied. While there are distinct potential chemical signatures from multiple drainage basins influencing the study area (Milliken et al 2008, Törnqvist et al 2015) and potential variations of fractionation locally within a single estuary Cherkinsky 2016, 2017), no additional reservoir correction was made for estuarine samples due to limited data available in the northern-central Gulf of Mexico (Reimer et al 2001).…”
Section: Radiocarbon Dating Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%