1956
DOI: 10.1103/physrev.103.394
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiochemical Studies of the Interaction of Lead with Protons in the Energy Range 0.6 to 3.0 Bev

Abstract: PHILIP ROSEN From Eqs. (29) and (30), we find R ADIOCHEMICAL studies of a wide variety of products resulting from the bombardment of bismuth with 340-Mev, 1 480-Mev, 2 and 660-Mev 3 pro-* Research performed under the auspices of the U. S. Atomic Energy Commission.f Now at

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

1957
1957
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a "shoulder" near the target, and a steep fall-off for decreasing mass number. For a given beam-target combination the shoulder becomes broader and lower, and the fall-off becomes less steep at increasing incident energies [1][2][3]6]. For a given target and equivalent total incident energy, the shoulder is broader when instead of proton, heavy-ion beams are used [5][6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…There is a "shoulder" near the target, and a steep fall-off for decreasing mass number. For a given beam-target combination the shoulder becomes broader and lower, and the fall-off becomes less steep at increasing incident energies [1][2][3]6]. For a given target and equivalent total incident energy, the shoulder is broader when instead of proton, heavy-ion beams are used [5][6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…One complication with this model was the observation that lighter clusters exhibited forward-peaked angular distributions, suggesting that a prompt non-statistical mechanism must also be present. Another perceptive proposal was that pion production and reabsorbtion could be a major mechanism for excitation-energy deposition in the heavy residual nucleus [4,5]. These studies, carried out at Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Brookhaven National Laboratory and in Russia, laid the groundwork for future studies and are reviewed in [6,7,8,9].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…study·could.be approximately expressed by the empirical relation- for Z = [6][7][8][9][10][11], and £ = 1.2 for Z = [12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. If we define T as the thickness of the ~E detector it is possible to derive from the above relationship the following expression, which has the useful feature that the quantity T/a is a constant for a particle with a given Z and A regardless of the energy of the particle.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%