1980
DOI: 10.1136/ard.39.5.508
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiological articular involvement in the dominant hand in rheumatoid arthritis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
26
2

Year Published

1983
1983
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
5
26
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Almost all patients had abnormal findings on radiographic and physical examinations. Our findings confirm that articular damage is greater in the dominant hand (27), although we did not find statistically significant differences, and that extensive radiographic changes are detectable using only a single PA radiograph of both hands and wrists (28,29).…”
Section: Acknowledgmentssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Almost all patients had abnormal findings on radiographic and physical examinations. Our findings confirm that articular damage is greater in the dominant hand (27), although we did not find statistically significant differences, and that extensive radiographic changes are detectable using only a single PA radiograph of both hands and wrists (28,29).…”
Section: Acknowledgmentssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…This could be because a variety of different evaluation methods have been used in previous studies, such as standard radiography and bone mineral density (BMD). [7,8,18,29] In the studies that used the Larsen score, it was noted that the dominant hand had more joint space narrowing and erosion compared with the non-dominant hand, which was similar to our findings. [7,8] However, in one of his studies, Luukkainen [30] evaluated the radiological difference between the hands of each patient with early RA and found no greater difference in destruction level in the dominant hand.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…[7,8,18,29] In the studies that used the Larsen score, it was noted that the dominant hand had more joint space narrowing and erosion compared with the non-dominant hand, which was similar to our findings. [7,8] However, in one of his studies, Luukkainen [30] evaluated the radiological difference between the hands of each patient with early RA and found no greater difference in destruction level in the dominant hand. In our study, more radiological damage was detected in the dominant hand, but this can be attributed to the fact that since our patients had an average disease duration of 15 years, the difference between the hands was more significant.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations