2020
DOI: 10.1177/1971400920919688
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘Railroad switch’ technique for stent-assisted coil embolization of a wide-neck bifurcation intracranial aneurysm: technical note

Abstract: Preservation of the posterior cerebral arteries during endovascular treatment of wide-neck basilar bifurcation aneurysms remains a technical challenge despite recent device innovations. We present a novel stent deployment technique, the ‘railroad switch’, to protect both posterior cerebral arteries during treatment of a recurrent basilar bifurcation aneurysm. Following asymmetric basilar–posterior cerebral artery stent deployment, favoring distal placement in a posterior cerebral artery, advancement of a jaile… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…26 In addition, we consider this new stent system as a perfect candidate for some alternative stenting techniques such as the 'Flow-T' setting or modified deployment manoeuvres such as the 'railroad switch'. 27,28 On the contrary, there is a certain concern regarding the new LVIS EVO stent observed in our series. Based on the discretion of the main operator and the fact that the new system comes with reduced nominal diameter and potentially lower radial force, each stent we used was slightly oversized with minimum 0.25 mm to the diameter of the target parent artery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…26 In addition, we consider this new stent system as a perfect candidate for some alternative stenting techniques such as the 'Flow-T' setting or modified deployment manoeuvres such as the 'railroad switch'. 27,28 On the contrary, there is a certain concern regarding the new LVIS EVO stent observed in our series. Based on the discretion of the main operator and the fact that the new system comes with reduced nominal diameter and potentially lower radial force, each stent we used was slightly oversized with minimum 0.25 mm to the diameter of the target parent artery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%