2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10824-017-9298-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rain and museum attendance: Are daily data fine enough?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Paying attention to public good complementarity has important methodological implica- 1 The closest analyses we know of consider the relationship between amenities and private consumption, Connolly (2008) and Graff Zivin and Neidell (2014), examine the relationship between weather and time use, and thus leisure as a good. Cuffe (2017) examines how rainfall influences museum attendance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Paying attention to public good complementarity has important methodological implica- 1 The closest analyses we know of consider the relationship between amenities and private consumption, Connolly (2008) and Graff Zivin and Neidell (2014), examine the relationship between weather and time use, and thus leisure as a good. Cuffe (2017) examines how rainfall influences museum attendance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, while year-on-year analysis is obviously necessary for linking museums with other year-on-year observed data, museums' activities are not restricted by, or contained within, discrete calendar years. In an optimal setting, data would be available in monthly, weekly, or daily intervals allowing for the minutiae analysis of factors influencing visit numbers, including those not considered in the present analysis , such as admission pricing, transport links, strikes, or other high impact events (Chen, 2007), and the weather (Cuffe, 2017). Ideally, one would consider how such variables interact with those specific to each museum, including its location (Waddop & Cutts, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bailey et al, 1997;Steiner, 1997), whether or not there is special exhibition on (e.g. Skinner, 2006), whether or not it is raining (see Cuffe, 2017), or simply where the museum is located (Brook, 2016;Cutts & Widdop, 2017;Widdop & Cutts, 2012). These, should, of course, be seen in relation to other individual factors, such as an interest in culture, willingness to spend time in a museum, and overall preparedness to pay any other costs associated with the visit such as those associated with retail and catering.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly, cinema attendance could be also related to weather conditions. Similarly, the negative effects of rain or snow have been recently found for museum attendance (Cuffe, 2018). However, given the very low quality of weather forecasts with a horizon longer than three days, a direct application for forecasting at one week ahead horizon is problematic.…”
Section: Limitations and Further Researchmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It should also be underlined that the cinema industry is similar to other branches of the entertainment industry. In the literature, we can find studies that have been devoted to forecasting attendance, for example in a museum (Cuffe, 2018). The results of Cuffe's study show that rainfall during certain hours of the day can significantly affect museum attendance.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%