1999
DOI: 10.1016/s1079-2104(99)70193-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Raised salivary endotoxin concentration as a predictor of infection in pediatric leukemia patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite so many positive reports of salivary applications, importantly there are reports clearly showing that saliva is not the fluid of choice for certain infectious conditions. For example, salivary endotoxin levels are not an accurate predictor of sepsis in pediatric leukemia patients and do not correlate with oropharyngeal carriage of aerobic gram‐negative bacilli in these patients (Millns, Martin and Williams, 1999).…”
Section: Infectious Diseasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite so many positive reports of salivary applications, importantly there are reports clearly showing that saliva is not the fluid of choice for certain infectious conditions. For example, salivary endotoxin levels are not an accurate predictor of sepsis in pediatric leukemia patients and do not correlate with oropharyngeal carriage of aerobic gram‐negative bacilli in these patients (Millns, Martin and Williams, 1999).…”
Section: Infectious Diseasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 However, endotoxin levels of up to 300 EU ml -1 have been found in the saliva of normal healthy subjects. 8 It is unlikely, therefore, that endotoxin concentrations of < 300 EU ml -1 will be of any clinical relevance. The ATP assay method used here was found to be very simple to use, was portable and gave virtually instant results (within one minute) making it very suitable for use at the chairside.…”
Section: Practitioner Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have demonstrated an increase in the number and proportion of Gram-negative bacilli such as Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella and Enterobacter spp. in the oral cavity of oncological patients, which are detected in approximately twothirds of all bacterial isolates (7,8). Gram-positive bacteria including coagulase-negative staphylococci and Enterococcus have also been identified in samples collected from immunocompromised patients (9,10).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%