2009 13th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design 2009
DOI: 10.1109/cscwd.2009.4968035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Random stimulus generation with self-tuning

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some studies enhance certain requirement (either speed or even distribution) but sacrifice the other [3][4][5][6][7][8]. The acceptance and rejection (A&R) technique proposed in [7] applies random samples to produce feasible patterns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Some studies enhance certain requirement (either speed or even distribution) but sacrifice the other [3][4][5][6][7][8]. The acceptance and rejection (A&R) technique proposed in [7] applies random samples to produce feasible patterns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However the pattern generation speed would be slow when constraints cannot be easily solved. As opposed to A&R technique, formal pattern generators [3][4][5][6] such as SAT solvers are robust to solve general constraints and provide unsatifiability analyses but sacrifice both speed and distribution. Further, another approach to increase success ratio for A&R technique such as RACE [8] applies interval propagation to reduce ranges of variables before sampling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The previous studies [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] are restricted to a single set of constraints and may cause either distribution violation or serious speed degradation if treating various sets of constraints independently.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the formal pattern generators [11][12][13][14] such as SAT engines can perform incremental SAT solving to share the learned clauses between various sets of constraints. By inserting an extra Boolean control variable in each clause, we can switch between constraint sets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%