2011
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.7679
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Randomized clinical trial comparing the cost and effectiveness of bipolar vessel sealers versus clips and vascular staplers for laparoscopic colorectal resection

Abstract: BVS devices are expedient and cost-efficient in proctectomy, left and total colectomy procedures.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
11
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Multiple investigators have evaluated the safety of vessel sealing and dividing devices in close proximity to vital structures as well as the temperature of sealed tissues . Previous articles describing clinical trials have reported device‐related thermal injuries with vessel sealing and dividing devices, such as ureter injury, small bowel perforations, colonic perforations, and vascular injury . Similar to the findings in the present study, Dunay et al reported that the surface temperature at the sealing site of a vessel sealing and dividing device reached 69.25°C ± 0.98°C.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Multiple investigators have evaluated the safety of vessel sealing and dividing devices in close proximity to vital structures as well as the temperature of sealed tissues . Previous articles describing clinical trials have reported device‐related thermal injuries with vessel sealing and dividing devices, such as ureter injury, small bowel perforations, colonic perforations, and vascular injury . Similar to the findings in the present study, Dunay et al reported that the surface temperature at the sealing site of a vessel sealing and dividing device reached 69.25°C ± 0.98°C.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Marcello and al [21] Conversion to open surgery representing 11.5% of surgeries was not significant between the two groups. Similar rates are found in the literature [18,22]. Targarona and al [5] reported however that conversion to other endoscopic techniques was higher in the conventional electrosurgery group.…”
supporting
confidence: 84%
“…The outbreak of those new energized vessel sealing systems in colorectal surgery has been one of the major innovative steps forward of the last years, reducing blood loss and operating time [17][18][19]. In this study, we found a significant shorter operating time (mean difference of 53 minutes in favor of EVSS).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…These devices expedite normally labor-intensive surgical procedures such as lobectomy, 1,2 nephrectomy, 3 gastric bypass, 4-6 splenectomy, 7,8 thyroidectomy, [9][10][11][12][13][14] hysterectomy, 15 and colectomy. [16][17][18][19] However, both electrosurgical and ultrasonic devices have limitations, including the potential for undesirable charring and unnecessarily large collateral thermal damage zones. [20][21][22] For example, more thermal energy is required to seal large blood vessels with such devices, and stray thermal energy escaping the seal area can lead to unintended lateral tissue thermal damage.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%