Randomized clinical trial on the survival of lithium disilicate posterior partial restorations bonded using immediate or delayed dentin sealing after 3 years of function

Breemer, Carline R. G. van den; Cune, Marco S.; Özcan, Mutlu; Naves, Lucas Zago; Kerdijk, Wouter; Gresnigt, Marco

doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2019.02.001

Cited by 32 publications

(62 citation statements)

References 29 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Significant differences among the conditioning methods tested were not observed. van der Breemer et al 2019 148 Randomized clinical trial Survival, success rate, and quality of survival of partial ceramic restorations Investigated the survival, success rate, and quality of survival of partial ceramic restorations (IPS e.max) in vital molars bonded using IDS (Clearfil SE Bond + Clearfil Majesty Flow) after 3 years of function. Ceramic restorations with IDS did not yield differences in the success rate or survival rate after 3 years of function.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Immediate Dentin Sealing: A Literature Review

Samartzi¹,

Papalexopoulos²,

Sarafianou³

et al. 2021

CCIDE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose The immediate application of a dentin-bonding agent after tooth preparation and before impression-taking (immediate dentin sealing [IDS]) has been suggested to provide several advantages concerning bacterial microleakage, hypersensitivity, and bonding quality. We reviewed the literature and clarified certain aspects related to each step of IDS application. Materials and Methods The search strategy comprised an electronic research in MEDLINE, Cochrane, Ovid and Scopus for studies published from January 1990 to December 2020 regarding the IDS technique and including both in vitro and clinical studies. Results After exclusion of irrelevant or duplicate articles, 88 articles focusing on aspects of the IDS technique were assessed. IDS seems to be advantageous with regard to bond strength, gap formation, bacterial microleakage, and dentin hypersensitivity. However, issues arising from interaction with impression materials, the provisional phase, and conditioning methods before cementation require further investigation. Conclusion There are no documented reasons preventing clinicians applying IDS in their everyday practice. On the contrary, the presented technique seems to be beneficial in certain aspects regarding indirect restorations.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Immediate Dentin Sealing: A Literature Review

Samartzi¹,

Papalexopoulos²,

Sarafianou³

et al. 2021

CCIDE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…134 Two randomized clinical trials published after 2015 with indirect posterior restorations did not observe any difference in success rate or post-luting sensitivity at 3 years when they compared the IDS technique with the conventional luting technique. 135,136 The 11-year results of a clinical trial with porcelain veneers on anterior teeth at 11 years found an increase in success rate from 81.8% to 96.4% using the IDS technique when the area of exposed dentin was above 50%. 137 6 | UNIVERSAL COMPOSITE RESINS Due to their considerable particle size, classical macrofilled composite resins did not polish well.…”

Section: Immediate Dentin Sealingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Adhesive dentistry: Current concepts and clinical considerations

Perdigão

Araújo

Ramos

et al. 2020

J Esthet Restor Dent

142

110

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives To address contemporary concepts in adhesive dental materials with emphasis on the evidence behind their clinical use. Overview Adhesive dentistry has undergone major transformations within the last 20 years. New dental adhesives and composite resins have been launched with special focus on their user‐friendliness by reducing the number of components and/or clinical steps. The latest examples are universal adhesives and universal composite resins. While clinicians prefer multipurpose materials with shorter application times, the simplification of clinical procedures does not always result in the best clinical outcomes. This review summarizes the current evidence on adhesive restorative materials with focus on universal adhesives and universal composite resins. Conclusions (a) Although the clinical behavior of universal adhesives has exceeded expectations, dentists still need to etch enamel to achieve durable restorations; (b) there is no clinical evidence to back some of the popular adjunct techniques used with dental adhesives, including glutaraldehyde‐based desensitizers and matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors; and (c) the color adaptation potential of new universal composite resins has simplified their clinical application by combining multiple shades without using different translucencies of the same shade. Clinical Significance New adhesive restorative materials are easier to use than their predecessors, while providing excellent clinical outcomes without compromising the esthetic quality of the restorations.

show abstract

“…Afterward, 2760 studies were excluded following reviewing the titles and abstracts, leaving a total of 30 articles to be assessed by full-text evaluation. From these, 8 studies were not considered for the qualitative analysis for various reasons: 4 were clinical studies [ 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 ], 2 studies did not evaluate bond strength [ 22 , 23 ], and in 2 studies, there was not a control group using DDS [ 24 , 25 ]. Thus, a total of 22 studies were considered in the qualitative analysis.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Immediate Dentin Sealing for Adhesive Cementation of Indirect Restorations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Hardan

Devoto²,

Bourgi

et al. 2022

Gels

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Immediate dentin sealing (IDS) involves applying an adhesive system to dentin directly after tooth preparation, before impression. This was considered an alternate to delayed dentin sealing (DDS), a technique in which hybridization is performed following the provisional phase and just before the indirect restoration luting procedure. This study aimed to compare the bond strength of restorations to dentin of the IDS and the DDS techniques throughout a systematic review and meta-analysis. The following PICOS framework was used: population, indirect restorations; intervention, IDS; control, DDS; outcomes, bond strength; and study design, in vitro studies. PubMed (MedLine), The Cochrane Library, ISI Web of Science, Scielo, Scopus, and Embase were screened up to January 2022 by two reviewers (L.H. and R.B.). In vitro papers studying the bond strength to human dentin of the IDS technique compared to the DDS technique were considered. Meta-analyses were carried out by using a software program (Review Manager v5.4.1; The Cochrane Collaboration). Comparisons were made by considering the adhesive used for bonding (two-step etch-and-rinse, three step etch-and-rinse, one-step self-etch, two-step self-etch, and universal adhesives). A total of 3717 papers were retrieved in all databases. After full-text assessment, 22 potentially eligible studies were examined for qualitative analysis, leaving a total of 21 articles for the meta-analysis. For the immediate bond strength, regardless of the adhesive strategy used, the IDS technique improved the bond strength of restorations to the dentin (p < 0.001). Taking into account the subgroup analysis, it seems that the use of the IDS technique with a two-step etch-and-rinse or a one-step self-etch adhesive system does not represent any advantage over the DDS technique (p = 0.07, p = 0.15). On the other hand, for the aged bond strength, regardless of the adhesive strategy used, the IDS technique improved the bond strength of restorations to the dentin (p = 0.001). The subgroups analysis shows that this improvement is observed only when a three-step etch-and-rinse adhesive system (p < 0.001) or when a combination of an adhesive system plus a layer of flowable resin (p = 0.01) is used. The in vitro evidence suggests that the use of the IDS technique improves the bond strength of dentin to resin-based restorations regardless of the adhesive strategy used. The use of a three-step etch-and-rinse adhesive system or the combination of an adhesive system plus a layer of flowable resin seems to considerably enhance the bond strength in the long term.

show abstract

Randomized clinical trial on the survival of lithium disilicate posterior partial restorations bonded using immediate or delayed dentin sealing after 3 years of function

Cited by 32 publications

References 29 publications

Immediate Dentin Sealing: A Literature Review

Immediate Dentin Sealing: A Literature Review

Adhesive dentistry: Current concepts and clinical considerations

Immediate Dentin Sealing for Adhesive Cementation of Indirect Restorations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About