2002
DOI: 10.1093/bja/aef203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Randomized, double-blind comparison of different inspired oxygen fractions during general anaesthesia for Caesarean section †

Abstract: Use of FI(O(2)) 1.0 during general anaesthesia for elective Caesarean section increased fetal oxygenation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Maternal hyperoxia is known to increase fetal oxygen supply provided there is normal placental function. This has been demonstrated in the human fetus by cordocentesis, pulse oximetry and postpartum umbilical cord blood sampling. Furthermore, using the BOLD MRI technique in the sheep fetus we have demonstrated that maternal hyperoxia increases fetal tissue oxygenation in a number of fetal organs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Maternal hyperoxia is known to increase fetal oxygen supply provided there is normal placental function. This has been demonstrated in the human fetus by cordocentesis, pulse oximetry and postpartum umbilical cord blood sampling. Furthermore, using the BOLD MRI technique in the sheep fetus we have demonstrated that maternal hyperoxia increases fetal tissue oxygenation in a number of fetal organs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…What is the evidence that it is appropriate to provide oxygen even though the mother is not hypoxemic? [7] As for the neonatal aspect, maternal use of inspired oxygen fractions <0.5 did not cause any change in the partial pressure of oxygen in the umbilical vein [2, 8]. Therefore, we conducted a prospective, randomized, controlled trial to determine the benefits of routinely administering supplemental, low-dose oxygen to uncomplicated parturients undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of these 12 studies, six did not include an intervention or comparator relevant to this review , in five studies the depth of anaesthesia differed between study arms [ and two papers reported on the ENIGMA‐2 study , which did not measure AAGA. Through this process we identified 22 publications covering 15 RCTs for inclusion in the review .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One study , although included in the qualitative synthesis of this review, could not be included in the primary analysis as the number of participants in each group was not reported. Eleven studies included a single comparison of a study group with nitrous oxide and a group without nitrous oxide , whereas four studies included more than one comparison . These ‘multi‐arm’ studies, included four or three comparison groups.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%