2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2010.04.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Randomized, Double-Masked, Sham-Controlled Trial of Ranibizumab for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: PIER Study Year 2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
155
0
13

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 308 publications
(176 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
6
155
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…Simply reducing the intravitreal injections to a fixed retreatment every 3 months was significantly inferior to monthly injections and resulted in the loss of initial visual acuity (VA) improvement. [8][9][10] Although the individually adjusted pro re nata (PRN) retreatment regimen was able to reduce the number of retreatments with (near) noninferiority of visual results as compared with monthly retreatment, 11,12 this regimen still requires monthly monitoring visits to detect disease recurrence and determine the need for retreatment. In a context of chronic care management and indefinite treatment duration, monthly monitoring visits place a heavy burden on ophthalmic institutions, with new patients being regularly added because of the high incidence of nAMD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simply reducing the intravitreal injections to a fixed retreatment every 3 months was significantly inferior to monthly injections and resulted in the loss of initial visual acuity (VA) improvement. [8][9][10] Although the individually adjusted pro re nata (PRN) retreatment regimen was able to reduce the number of retreatments with (near) noninferiority of visual results as compared with monthly retreatment, 11,12 this regimen still requires monthly monitoring visits to detect disease recurrence and determine the need for retreatment. In a context of chronic care management and indefinite treatment duration, monthly monitoring visits place a heavy burden on ophthalmic institutions, with new patients being regularly added because of the high incidence of nAMD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is significant evidence demonstrating the efficacy of intravitreal ranibizumab in either improving or stabilising visual acuity in patients treated for CNV secondary to AMD. [24][25][26][27] Previous studies have demonstrated that ranibizumab has a prolonged effect in either stabilising or improving vision in CNV secondary to AS. 13 19 Vadalà et al 20 reported a series of nine patients who received 0.3 mg ranibizumab injections with a mean follow-up of 14 months.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ranibizumab (Lucentis â ) is a monoclonal antibody Fab fragment that inhibits neovascularization and leakage from vessels by binding to vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A) (Chen et al 1999;Rosenfeld et al 2006a,b). The efficacy of ranibizumab has been demonstrated in pivotal phase III trials (MARINA, ANCHOR and PIER) in which patients with choroidal neovascularization (CNV) associated with AMD receiving intravitreal injections of ranibizumab experienced a sustained improvement in mean visual acuity over time (Rosenfeld et al 2006a,b;Brown et al 2009;Abraham et al 2010). In addition, ranibizumab was well tolerated and considered safe (Rosenfeld et al 2006a,b;Mitchell et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%