2018
DOI: 10.3390/app8101974
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rank-Based Comparative Research Flow Benchmarking the Effectiveness of AHP–GTMA on Aiding Decisions of Shredder Selection by Reference to AHP–TOPSIS

Abstract: The AHP–GTMA (analytic hierarchy process and graph theory and matrix approach) has been applied to select the best paper shredder before a company was making a bulk purchase order. However, there is a question as to whether one such relatively recent approach is effective to aid the selection decision problems in industrial/commercial practice. In this paper, a novel multi-measure, rank-based comparative research flow is proposed. The real decision problem case mentioned above is solved using the AHP–GTMA and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of studies have explored location determinants of various food outlets via various MADM models or statistical analyses. As a classic methodology used in decision-making (dos Santos et al, 2019), AHP is the most commonly used approach in location selection (Tzeng et al, 2002;Özcan et al, 2011;Subramanian & Ramanathan, 2012;Ho et al, 2013;Dehe & Bamfor, 2015;Zhuang et al, 2017Zhuang et al, , 2018aZhuang et al, , 2018bZhuang et al, , 2019Yıldız & Tüysüz, 2019); however, unrealistic assumptions concerning the independent relationship among the concerning factors presents a drawback (Liu et al, 2018a;Shen & Tzeng, 2018;Chen et al, 2019;Lin et al, 2021). Although the Analytic Network Process (ANP) method tries to explore the mutual influence relationship (Tolga et al, 2013;Neumüller et al, 2015), it also lacks a strong support for interactions relationship (Gölcük & Baykasoĝlua, 2016).…”
Section: The Modelling Procedures For the Hybrid Madm Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies have explored location determinants of various food outlets via various MADM models or statistical analyses. As a classic methodology used in decision-making (dos Santos et al, 2019), AHP is the most commonly used approach in location selection (Tzeng et al, 2002;Özcan et al, 2011;Subramanian & Ramanathan, 2012;Ho et al, 2013;Dehe & Bamfor, 2015;Zhuang et al, 2017Zhuang et al, , 2018aZhuang et al, , 2018bZhuang et al, , 2019Yıldız & Tüysüz, 2019); however, unrealistic assumptions concerning the independent relationship among the concerning factors presents a drawback (Liu et al, 2018a;Shen & Tzeng, 2018;Chen et al, 2019;Lin et al, 2021). Although the Analytic Network Process (ANP) method tries to explore the mutual influence relationship (Tolga et al, 2013;Neumüller et al, 2015), it also lacks a strong support for interactions relationship (Gölcük & Baykasoĝlua, 2016).…”
Section: The Modelling Procedures For the Hybrid Madm Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These numbers then form a 'statistical variable' that is titled with the abbreviated country name (e.g., GER). Each statistical variable, on the other side, can be treated as a vector whose elements are ordered [26,27] according to a certain sequence of all possible 3-tuples that are prefixed by G or H. Thus, 9 such variables (vectors) are obtained, so the correlation between each pair of these variables is then identified. A so-called 'correlation matrix', which is shown in Table 2, is then obtained by filling in these numbers.…”
Section: Total Correlation Matrix Of the Patenting Activities Among Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, given the confident results in this study, more in-depth future researches can also be expected. For example, the number of interviewees may be increased so the knowledge can be explored on a group basis, while the group/subgroup analytical methods can be introduced [2] [3], as the group-based mind-mining process [11] is a focused cognitive topic in the recent development of datadriven decision-making (DDM, or D 3 M) [12]. In this sense, this study is a pilot work for subsequent studies which pertain to the decision of BIM system adoption.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%