2021
DOI: 10.5937/jouproman2103001k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ranking Service Quality using multi-criteria decision-making methods: Example of Erzurum province

Abstract: In the tourism sector, where competition conditions are getting stiffer, some of the essential factors to hotels stay operational include the need to achieve a sustainable structure and meet the needs and expectations of customers. One of the ways to ensure that the customer expectations and needs are met at the desired level is through service quality factors which are considered to increase customer satisfaction. This study aims to establish the service quality criteria in three-star hotels in Erzurum and to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During COVID-19, the authors recommended paying attention to safety and health practices, distant working circumstances, and localization while selecting suppliers. In addition to the abovementioned MCDM techniques used in supplier selection problem, there are many other effective and novel methods that have been widely applied in multiple industries, such as SWOT analysis [33], Analytic Network Process (ANP) [34], Evaluation Based on Distance from Average Solution (EDAS) [35], Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) [36], COmbined COmpromise SOlution (CoCoSo) [37,38], Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) [39], Measurement Alternatives and Ranking according to the Compromise Solution (MARCOS) [40], Simple Weighted Sum Product (WISP) [41], Simultaneous Evaluation of Criteria and Alternatives (SECA) [42], to name a few. Table 1 summarizes the methodologies taken by researchers in the realm of supplier and SSS green practices.…”
Section: Literature Review On Sss and Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…During COVID-19, the authors recommended paying attention to safety and health practices, distant working circumstances, and localization while selecting suppliers. In addition to the abovementioned MCDM techniques used in supplier selection problem, there are many other effective and novel methods that have been widely applied in multiple industries, such as SWOT analysis [33], Analytic Network Process (ANP) [34], Evaluation Based on Distance from Average Solution (EDAS) [35], Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) [36], COmbined COmpromise SOlution (CoCoSo) [37,38], Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) [39], Measurement Alternatives and Ranking according to the Compromise Solution (MARCOS) [40], Simple Weighted Sum Product (WISP) [41], Simultaneous Evaluation of Criteria and Alternatives (SECA) [42], to name a few. Table 1 summarizes the methodologies taken by researchers in the realm of supplier and SSS green practices.…”
Section: Literature Review On Sss and Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Step 6: First, the optimality criterion K is determined using Equation (39). Then, the utility degree of each alternative N h is calculated by comparing the alternatives under consideration with the best alternative (i.e., 100% for the best alternative), as can be seen in Equation (40).…”
Section: Linguistics Scale Grey Number [X X]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These values are adapted from [57]. The grey best-to-others vector showing these comparisons is indicated in Equation (7).…”
Section: Grey Bwmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that, in order to be sustainable, businesses must address environmental challenges, while also satisfying social criteria at all levels of the supply chain and attaining specified economic outcomes. As a result, the sustainable supplier selection decision problem is frequently referred to as a multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) problem [5][6][7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) was first used in the 1970s and has been quickly evolving since then. Many significant MCDM approaches have been proposed as a result of rapid development and use for tackling a broad range of decision-making problems [1][2][3][4][5]. Some of the MCDM methods frequently encountered in the literature are as follows; SAW [6], CP [7], ELECTRE [8], AHP [9], TOPSIS [10], PROMETHEE [11], MACBETH [12], MULTIMOORA [13], and ARAS [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%