2019
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics10010008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid Multiplex Real-Time PCR Method for the Detection and Quantification of Selected Cariogenic and Periodontal Bacteria

Abstract: Dental caries and periodontal diseases are associated with a shift from symbiotic microbiota to dysbiosis. The aim of our study was to develop a rapid, sensitive, and economical method for the identification and quantification of selected cariogenic and periodontal oral bacteria. Original protocols were designed for three real-time multiplex PCR assays to detect and quantify the ratio of 10 bacterial species associated with dental caries (“cariogenic” complex) or periodontal diseases (red complex, orange compl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The R 2 -values, ranging from 0.984 to 1.000, indicate a linear correspondence between the logarithmic genome copy number and their Cq-values. The efficiency (E), as one of the most important indicators of the performance of a qPCR assay, was between 86.4 and 104.7% in simplex, and between 90.6 and 103.4% in multiplex assays, which proves a good performance of the primer-probe sets (Baudy et al, 2019;Lochman et al, 2019). In all four assays, PCR probes appeared to be very specific and no loss of activity was observed upon multiplexing.…”
Section: Performance Of Simplex and Multiplexed Qpcr Assaysmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The R 2 -values, ranging from 0.984 to 1.000, indicate a linear correspondence between the logarithmic genome copy number and their Cq-values. The efficiency (E), as one of the most important indicators of the performance of a qPCR assay, was between 86.4 and 104.7% in simplex, and between 90.6 and 103.4% in multiplex assays, which proves a good performance of the primer-probe sets (Baudy et al, 2019;Lochman et al, 2019). In all four assays, PCR probes appeared to be very specific and no loss of activity was observed upon multiplexing.…”
Section: Performance Of Simplex and Multiplexed Qpcr Assaysmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…High costs for labeling of each end of the probes with different dyes is in comparison to the use of intercalating dyes is compensated by higher selectivity and a reduced process time in multiplexed assays. Multiplex TaqMan qPCR recently appeared to be a very useful tool for the identification and quantification of different microbial communities (Farkas et al, 2017;Baudy et al, 2019;Enora et al, 2019;Lochman et al, 2019). Accordingly, this study aims to establish a multiplex qPCR approach for the simultaneous detection and quantification of eleven frequently reported bacteria and yeast species of milk kefirs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To rapidly detect specific oral pathogens, methods based on the detection of specific bacterial DNA sequences have become invaluable in basic dental science and translational research [ 38 ]. In particular, multiplex real-time PCR is a sensitive method for detecting and quantifying a small number of bacteria in clinical samples.…”
Section: Effective and Rapid Detection Of Oral Microbiota Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modified Hopfield neural network [26] or advanced fuzzy decision making [28] would be the solution to our problem, which warrants further research. Moreover, similar to the research in [29,30], the proposed algorithms need to be applied to different datasets. In future works, we will make the implementations on a wider range of different, complex dental image datasets to verify the suitability of this algorithm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%