2016
DOI: 10.5603/dk.2016.0023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rare cases of bezoars in the urinary tract of diabetic patients — a review of case reports

Abstract: ABSTRACT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar proportions of patients were also diabetic. Chronic hyperglycemia weakens the immune defence mechanism and thus predisposes to fungal infections among diabetic patients . In addition, long‐term diabetes leads to bladder dysfunction or diabetic cystopathy, which is associated with impaired bladder emptying and hence high risk of urinary tract infections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar proportions of patients were also diabetic. Chronic hyperglycemia weakens the immune defence mechanism and thus predisposes to fungal infections among diabetic patients . In addition, long‐term diabetes leads to bladder dysfunction or diabetic cystopathy, which is associated with impaired bladder emptying and hence high risk of urinary tract infections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Renal fungus ball or bezoar is a mixture of fungal cells and sloughed renal epithelial cells which form a mass capable of obstructing the urinary tract . The formation of fungus ball usually results from either ongoing fungal infection in the urinary tract or as part of systemic infection . Candida species is the main pathogen of renal fungus ball , although infections due to other species such as Aspergillus and Mucorales have been reported .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous reports on fungal urosepsis have identified diabetes mellitus and immunosuppression as major risk factors for this disease [ 7 , 8 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%