2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.136062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rare earth elements in the upland soils of northern China: Spatial variation, relationships, and risk assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ratio of LREEs/REEs in all areas was high (over 60%) and the ratio of LREEs/HREEs in these areas exhibited a rather large disparity, e.g., in the Southeast (6.9), while the Central Highlands (3.9), the Northwest (6.6) and the Northeast (5.2). The result was similar to the previous publication with the proportion of LREEs accounting for 5.04 -9.06 times which has been reported by Lian et al [21]. These results show that the elements of the LREEs group dominated the total content in all study areas with the proportions of 80.3% in the Southeast, 79.4% in the Northeast, and 79.5% in the Northwest, which are much higher 64.3% compared to the Central Highlands.…”
Section: The Geographical Distribution Of Reessupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The ratio of LREEs/REEs in all areas was high (over 60%) and the ratio of LREEs/HREEs in these areas exhibited a rather large disparity, e.g., in the Southeast (6.9), while the Central Highlands (3.9), the Northwest (6.6) and the Northeast (5.2). The result was similar to the previous publication with the proportion of LREEs accounting for 5.04 -9.06 times which has been reported by Lian et al [21]. These results show that the elements of the LREEs group dominated the total content in all study areas with the proportions of 80.3% in the Southeast, 79.4% in the Northeast, and 79.5% in the Northwest, which are much higher 64.3% compared to the Central Highlands.…”
Section: The Geographical Distribution Of Reessupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In each area, the REEs content also fluctuates depending on altitude. Factors, i.e., the effects of weathering processes, erosion, and landslides cause sedimentation and increase REEs content in low-altitude locations [21,22]. In addition, the effects of farming activities, using fertilizers supplemented with REEs [23] and the processes of mining and transporting minerals and ores containing REEs also contribute to an increase in the REEs content in the soil.…”
Section: The Geographical Distribution Of Reesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the results showed that Ce is depleted in comparison to the other REEs, with all samples showing negative Ce anomaly, ranging from 0.03 to 0.82, with an average value of 0.33. Positive Ce anomaly is typically associated with the enrichment in HREEs, whereas negative Ce anomaly suggests LREEs enrichment [ 68 ]. Furthermore, positive Ce anomaly implies the presence of highly soluble Ce(III), whereas negative Ce anomaly suggests Ce(III) oxidation to weakly soluble Ce(IV) and is usually associated with high alkalinity or high pH values [ 6 , 37 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ecological risk studies have been based on the toxicity coefficients of REYs, for which it was reported that they were similar to those of HMs [ 33 ]. It was reported that the ecological risks due to the REY presence in soil [ 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 ], sediment [ 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 ], and street dust were relatively low. Moreover, the estimated non-cancer and cancer human health risks from soil [ 45 , 46 , 47 ], sediments [ 48 ], air [ 49 ], and the consumption of vegetables fall below the acceptable safety limits [ 50 , 51 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%