“…Similar selection criteria for the ionic conducting material have to be considered allowing for high electronic conductivity in combination with a high chemical and thermal compatibility [ 4 ]. The above-mentioned factors have made Ce 0.8 Sm 0.2 O 2− δ –Sm 0.5 Sr 0.5 Fe 0.8 Cu 0.2 O 3− δ (CSO-SSFCO), Ce 0.9 Pr 0.1 O 2− δ –Pr 0.6 Ca 0.4 FeO 3− δ (CPO-PCFO), Ce 0.8 Gd 0.2 O 2− δ –Pr 0.5 Sr 0.5 Fe 0.5 Co 0.5 O 3− δ (CGO-PSFCO), and Ce 0.9 Nd 0.1 O 2− δ –Nd 0.6 Sr 0.4 CoO 3− δ (CNO-NSCO) intensively investigated materials [ 2 , 3 , 4 , 6 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 ]. Although the CO 2 resistance has been improved, most of their oxygen permeation fluxes are still too low to meet the requirements for practical applications.…”