1983
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.80.11.3499
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rates of receptor-dependent and -independent low density lipoprotein uptake in the hamster.

Abstract: By using a constant infusion technique in the hamster, rates of uptake of ['4C]sucrose-labeled hamster low density lipoprotein (hamLDL) and methylated hamster LDL (MehamLDL) were directly measured in 15 tissues. From these measurements the magnitude of LDL receptor-dependent-and receptor-independent lipoprotein transport was calculated. The whole-animal clearance of hamLDL equaled 547 p1I/hr per 100 g of body weight. LDL clearance per g of tissue was highest in the liver (114 pI/hr per g), ovary (43), spleen (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
127
0
1

Year Published

1986
1986
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 197 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
127
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Food consumption was not reduced, and body rabbits, although receptor mRNA levels were similar in both weight was not decreased during bile fistula and glycodeoxyrabbit groups. However, as previously noted by Spady et al 35 cholic acid infusion periods. Bile flow was 3.4 { 0.6 and 3.6 and Stalenhoef et al, 36 in WHHL rabbits, the clearance of { 0.4 mL/h, respectively, in NZW and WHHL rabbits after cholesterol bound to LDL via the receptor-mediated pathway 5 days of bile drainage and increased 2.5 times (8.8 { 1.1 and was almost nil.…”
Section: Statistical Studymentioning
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Food consumption was not reduced, and body rabbits, although receptor mRNA levels were similar in both weight was not decreased during bile fistula and glycodeoxyrabbit groups. However, as previously noted by Spady et al 35 cholic acid infusion periods. Bile flow was 3.4 { 0.6 and 3.6 and Stalenhoef et al, 36 in WHHL rabbits, the clearance of { 0.4 mL/h, respectively, in NZW and WHHL rabbits after cholesterol bound to LDL via the receptor-mediated pathway 5 days of bile drainage and increased 2.5 times (8.8 { 1.1 and was almost nil.…”
Section: Statistical Studymentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Because it is well known that LDL receptors are deficient a high intake of dietary cholesterol like a rat so that cholesterol 7a-hydroxylase was increased and the absorbed cholesor do not function properly in WHHL rabbits, 7,[35][36][37] it was of interest to note the considerable amounts of LDL receptor terol was converted efficiently to bile acids. Similar results have been reported for a selected group of rabbits who show mRNA and receptor-mediated binding that could be detected in the liver of these rabbits.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 The receptor-independent component of this uptake process can also be assessed with use of methylated heterologous LDL, which is not recognized by the LDL receptor.4 '5 When the appropriate regression curves are fitted to such data for determination of either total LDL uptake DIAGNOSTIC METHODS-LDL CHOLESTEROL (equation 3) or receptor-independent LDL transport (equation 2), the best-fit kinetic curves are obtained for each organ. Examples of such curves are shown in figure 1 for four organs of the hamster.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Saturated fatty acids. SFA increase plasma total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol levels by decreasing LDL receptor-mediated catabolism (Spady et al 1983;Nicolosi et al 1990). However, not all SFA affect total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol concentrations in the same manner.…”
Section: Biological Effects Of the Various Classes Of Fatty Acidmentioning
confidence: 99%